Environmental ethics - Utilitarianism

?
  • Created by: Alasdair
  • Created on: 22-05-17 09:52
View mindmap
  • Utilitarianism and environmental ethics
    • Outline
      • Greatest happiness preserving Earth because people live longer
      • More happiness  created when more generations can enjoy clean environment
      • X individual people will want to look after world
        • Cause too much disruption = unhappiness
      • Each situation needs to be weighed up according to hedonistic calculus
        • Most benefits (happiness) against cost (pain)
      • Singer:
        • Some unspoilt regions are difficult to recreate and restore.
        • Singer called these 'World Heritage' inherited from ancestors and must be given to our children
      • Is the pain in poor countries because of the environmental crisis
        • E.g. spread of malaria, drought,
        • Justify happiness in rich countries
          • e.g. running three cars
    • Bentham
      • Utility
        • Usefulness of environment for human benefit
          • Alright to use fossil fuels, chopping down forests for houses)
      • Greater good + net benefit
        • = greater good for humans over environment
        • General welfare
        • Better  serves
      • Hedonistic calculus
        • Future generations = sustainability
        • Greater good
    • Mill (quality)
      • Higher + lower pleasures
      • Return to nature
      • Learning through and about nature
      • Connection enjoyment of nature
      • Beauty of nature
    • Rule utilitarianism
      • Greater good is something rules universalise
      • Common good to all
      • Universalisation
      • World
      • Planet
    • Evaluation
      • General
        • Greater good for humans
        • Bentham considers future generations
        • Look at usefulness of environment for humans
          • Have both those considerations - allows you to make judgements on what is good for environment and for humans (neither deep nor shallow)
        • Human development is threatened
      • Bentham
        • Has a moral duty to preserve the environment
        • Treating animals with dignity and some sense of value allows environment/ecosystems to be protected
        • No demand for change in mindset
        • Broad approach = put whatever you want first (weakness)
        • Don't know what future generations will want
        • Treating animals with dignity would have implications for future medical research
        • The broad approach allows you to put whatever you want first

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Religious Studies resources:

See all Religious Studies resources »See all Ethics resources »