essay plan 2.1
- Created by: Emilyburkee
- Created on: 29-12-20 15:16
View mindmap
- The tsarist regieme survived in 1905 mainly due to the concessions it made to its opponents
- LOA- was the main reason
- P1- yes - August manifesto was introduced as a way to end the strikes - saw through this and was rejected as it did not go far enough
- duma had no real power
- fact it was rejected shows that the peasants ect wanted reform
- shows that concessions were going to be necessary
- duma had no real power
- P2- counter agrument - it was the long held belief of autocracy
- before bloody sunday , many didnt want the removal of the tsar just wanted reform
- shows that the resaon that the tsardom may have survived was the fact that many moderates wanted to keep it
- However without reform the strikes would have continued and the tsardom would have collapsed
- Untitled
- P3- October manifesto - strikes had contued and were at their hight in oct
- guaranteed basic freedoms and gave the duma real power
- this stopped the striking showsing that it was concessions that the-tsar wass forced to make that ended the revolutions and allowed him to survived
- 400,000 protesting
- Conclusion- concessions were the only way the regime could survive other than imposing militray rule
Comments
No comments have yet been made