Outbreak of Civil War
- Created by: LamisaAmber
- Created on: 09-05-17 08:56
View mindmap
- Outbreak of the Civil War 1640 - 1642
- Short Parliament (April-May 1640)
- 1st Bishops' War
- Needed money to finance it, Wentworth advised calling Parliament
- Thought MPs could be won over with bribes, threats and patriotism to King
- Commons, led by Pym and Hampden, launched an attack on King
- Attack on civil liberties, parliamentary liberties, innovations in religion, violations of property
- Charles demanded taxes before hearing grievances, Parliament want grievances heard
- Atmosphere of hostility, Charles dissolves it after 3 weeks = no subsidies
- Charles renews war anyway= 2nd Bishops' War w/ loans from private corporations
- Arrests some opposition e.g. Pym
- Petition of 12 Peers August 1640
- Issued by Lords including Bedford and Warwick
- Protested against innovations in religion, popery, Ship Money, length of time w/out parliament
- Council of Peers - would not cooperate with Charles until another Parliament called (september 1640)
- 1st Bishops' War
- Long Parliament (November 1640)
- Parliament in touch with Scots since 1st BW - Puritan pop in league with Presbyterians
- Strong opposition in Parliament due to Laudian Reforms and Scottish war
- Parliament's Position November 1640
- Strong - Charles is relying on them to provide him money - opp to have grievances heard
- Unified group of MPs engineering moves against king e.g. Pym, Haselrig, Holles
- Mobilised support in London - London Mob
- Created coordinated plan to exert pressure on the king
- In contact with Scots since 1637
- King thought he would get money with few small concessions but parliament's grievances are pent up
- Charles in Scotland
- Covenanters
- Split into radicals and moderates - Parl fear Charles using them
- Pro-King faction = Cumbernauld Band
- Split into radicals and moderates - Parl fear Charles using them
- 1641 King's Actions
- Appoints leading Royalists to positions in Scotland e.g. Earl of Argyll = Marquis of Argyll
- Goes to Scotland to sign Treaty of London in Scotland to end Bishops' war
- Appoints leading Royalists to positions in Scotland e.g. Earl of Argyll = Marquis of Argyll
- 'The Incident' August 1641
- Prominent members of Covenanters who opposed Charles = targets
- Royalist plot to capture anti-Royalist covenanters but failed
- Charles looks to be trying to mount support in Scotland and destroy Covenanters' unity by force
- Misses oppurtunity to capitalise on Pym's weakening support by acting slippery
- Pym has to become more radical to keep power from the king
- Royalist plot to capture anti-Royalist covenanters but failed
- Prominent members of Covenanters who opposed Charles = targets
- Covenanters
- Irish Rebellion 1641
- Long-term result of 'plantation' policy
- Fear increasing Puritan rule in England and Scotland
- Irish rebellion is frightening to England - Pym can push through radical measures e.g. Grand Remonstrance
- Events C16th and C17th: gunpowder plot 1605, 30 years war, excommunication of Elizabeth, Papal Bull
- Affected the army - need to send army to rescue Protestants but no longer trust King after Incident, Army Plot
- Preorggative powers being questioned by Parl
- Affected the army - need to send army to rescue Protestants but no longer trust King after Incident, Army Plot
- Events C16th and C17th: gunpowder plot 1605, 30 years war, excommunication of Elizabeth, Papal Bull
- Parliament and Charles' Actions
- Root and Branch Petition December 1640
- Triennial Act Feb 1641
- Threat of Scots used to force king to consent
- Had to call Parl every 3 years
- Could assemble uncalled if not summoned
- Threat of Scots used to force king to consent
- Bridging Appointments 1641
- Settlement by Bedford to bridge gap between MPs and King
- Saye & Sele, Bedford and Essex to be in PC to advise Charles
- Proposed Pam as Chancellor but Bedford dies, hating progress
- Settlement by Bedford to bridge gap between MPs and King
- Trial and Execution of Strafford November 1640
- First Turning Point - radical action
- Strafford and Charles see Parl/Scot alliance as treason, English fear use of Irish against Scots
- Hard to get impeachment through Lords = Act of Attainder instead
- Used London Mob to push it through - intimidated King and his family at Whitehall
- King signed warrant = personally responsible. Accused Strafford of imposing 'arbitrary gov'
- Needed money from Parl, both houses had agreed = no choice, London Mob
- Charles left weak in position, isolated
- Divisions between King and Parl deepen - opposition to King has become radical and willing to exert pressure on him, Army Plot = King is dangerous
- Divisions within Parliament - execution too radical for some - Holles, Digby and Hyde upset. Too removed from traditional law
- Army Plot
- Pym revealed army's plot to free Strafford from tower and dissolve parliament forcibly w/ King's support = Lords pass bill out of fear of coup
- King signed warrant = personally responsible. Accused Strafford of imposing 'arbitrary gov'
- Strafford and Charles see Parl/Scot alliance as treason, English fear use of Irish against Scots
- First Turning Point - radical action
- Ten Propositions June 1641
- Petition from Parliament to King by Pym
- C to delay visit to Scotland, worries of King using Scot Army against Parl, C to remove Catholic priests from Queen's service
- Pment to oversee Charles' choice of advisors
- Direct challenge to C's prerogative - rejected and left for Scotland
- Petition from Parliament to King by Pym
- Abolition of Star Chamber and Ship Money Made Illegal
- King's prerogative rights challenged- can no longer be financially self-sufficient
- 2nd Army Plot Nov 1641
- Pym claims a 2nd Plot taking places to bring army to action in South in support of royal power
- In order to protect Scottish neutral leaders, king and moderate parliamentarians
- Pym sough to rally support to put local militias on alert against this & King failed to get support
- In order to protect Scottish neutral leaders, king and moderate parliamentarians
- Pym claims a 2nd Plot taking places to bring army to action in South in support of royal power
- Grand RemonstranceOct 1641
- Irish rebellion allowed him to be more radical - overview of Charles' PR mishaps and Long Parl's achievements and remaining grievances
- Justified opposition in order to rally parliament to the cause
- Given only the option of supporting or rejecting all of it - associating those who didn't with King
- Justified opposition in order to rally parliament to the cause
- Causes divisions amongst Parl - passed only by 159 votes to 148 - swords drawn, 12 hour debate
- Polarised opposition, too radical for some - outraged king and sympathisers, unprecedented insult to king and invited people to involve themselves in politics
- King rejected it straightaway, polarising political nation
- Proposed influence over royal officers, HofL to be cleared of bishops and Catholic Peers, church reform to be supervised - unprecedented limits on Charles
- King rejected it straightaway, polarising political nation
- Polarised opposition, too radical for some - outraged king and sympathisers, unprecedented insult to king and invited people to involve themselves in politics
- Publishing of GR - instability - open criticism of king, destabilise traditional order of country, growing awareness of Mob's power
- Popular Radicalism
- London Mob - low church separators from C of E spurred by: neutralising of Laud, abolition of prerogative courts, collapse of censorship and thorough, release of prisoners e.g. Prynne
- Mob involvement: Strafford execution, R&B Petition, prevent bishops entering HofL 1642 Jan, Grand Remonstrance
- London- key point of Puritan contacts, merchant networks, spread influence through links with manufacturing
- Sources of information - pamphlets, newspapers and Pym
- Popular Radicalism
- Irish rebellion allowed him to be more radical - overview of Charles' PR mishaps and Long Parl's achievements and remaining grievances
- Nineteen Propositions June 1642
- Parl's final attempt at a settlement
- Demanded concessions: control of PC, control education of King's children, supervise foreign policy, Catholic peers to be excluded, reform of CofE, approval of militia ordinance
- King rejected it as subversion of fundamental laws
- Militia Bill Dec 1641
- Parliament want army under control of a general appointed by them
- Pym states King should only employ Parliamentary approved conunsellors
- Major encroachmenton King's prerogative, radical - destroy balance of current constitution
- Divided conservatives from radicals
- Attempt on Five Members Jan 1642
- King commands impeachment proceedings for 5 members of commons on basis on treason
- Fails to arrest members - Pam, Hampden, Haselrig, Holles, Strode, Mandeville
- Surrounded by hostile crowd on way back to Whitehall - king and family flee London. Charles' supporters leave Commons and Lords to show support
- Pym can now pass through legislation with little opposition - passed Bishops Exclusion Act, Miliia Bill becomes Militia Ordinance March 1642
- Beginning to go beyond trying to restore privileges and now advancing them instead
- Commissions of Array June 1642
- In response to Militia Ordinance - called all soldiers to follow him. Set up base in York - increased opposition fear of attack
- Hull under parliamentary control - refuse to give Royal arsenal to Charles
- Pym can now pass through legislation with little opposition - passed Bishops Exclusion Act, Miliia Bill becomes Militia Ordinance March 1642
- Surrounded by hostile crowd on way back to Whitehall - king and family flee London. Charles' supporters leave Commons and Lords to show support
- Fails to arrest members - Pam, Hampden, Haselrig, Holles, Strode, Mandeville
- King commands impeachment proceedings for 5 members of commons on basis on treason
- Formation of Two Sides
- Pym's radicalism
- Charles' blunders
- London Mob intervention
- Parliament divided over: religious policies (some liked Anglicanism), dislike of methods of Pym's Junto (conservatism), anti-Scottish stance
- People chose sides according to: geography, social class, economic interests, religious beliefs, local interests, traditional loyalties
- Neutrality
- Raised a 3rd party army, demilitarised or made pacts with other counties
- Neutrality
- Short Parliament (April-May 1640)
Comments
No comments have yet been made