Unit 3 - Murder

?
  • Created by: chelsea
  • Created on: 27-10-12 19:03
What 4 points must be listed in the murder introduction?
Life Sentence Most serious criminal offence Common law ofence Actus reus and mens rea to both be proven
1 of 19
What is the actus reus of murder?
The defendant did the act or omitted to do a legally recognised duty. (an act or omission) The act was deliberate. The act was unlawful. (As opposed to killing in self defence). The act was a significant cause of death.
2 of 19
What case supports factual causation?
R.v.White
3 of 19
What is the 'but for' test?
But for D's actions, harm would not have occured to V
4 of 19
What cases support legal causation?
R.v.Smith and R.v.Cheshire
5 of 19
What does 'operating and substantial cause mean'?
Main Cause of the harm to the victim
6 of 19
What is the definition of novus actus intervienens?
An intervening act e.g. Act of God or a reckless act of a person that intervenes so that D is not responsible.
7 of 19
What type of case is R.v.Roberts used for?
Escape cases
8 of 19
What case demonstrates the thin skull rule?
R.v.Blaue
9 of 19
What is the mens rea of murder?
Maliceaforthought - intent to cause GBH
10 of 19
Who developed the definition of actus reus and mens rea?
Sir Edward Coke
11 of 19
Define direct intent for murder:
Where it is D's main aim to kill or cause GBH
12 of 19
What case supports direct intent?
R.v.White
13 of 19
Define oblique intent for murder:
D caused the illegal result, knowing that the consequence was virtually certain (foreseeable)
14 of 19
What cases support oblique intent?
R.v.Woollin and R.v.Hancock and Shankland
15 of 19
Define transferred malice:
Where D intended to hurt IV but hurt the AV instead
16 of 19
What cases support transferred malice?
R.v.Latimer and R.v.Savage
17 of 19
Define the contemporaneity rule:
Where the actus reus occured 1st and the mens rea developed later
18 of 19
What cases support the contemporaneity rule?
Thabo Mehli.v.R and R.v.Fagan
19 of 19

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What is the actus reus of murder?

Back

The defendant did the act or omitted to do a legally recognised duty. (an act or omission) The act was deliberate. The act was unlawful. (As opposed to killing in self defence). The act was a significant cause of death.

Card 3

Front

What case supports factual causation?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

What is the 'but for' test?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

What cases support legal causation?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »