Law Case Studies
- Created by: lucybx
- Created on: 17-12-14 19:57
S | Q | M | X | V | X | L | G | B | D | P | G | J | H | A | X | Q | W | J | E | M |
E | D | F | X | D | Y | S | O | O | O | H | D | N | I | N | H | N | N | V | K | U |
W | S | F | T | Q | S | M | L | U | L | P | P | A | L | E | U | O | E | J | R | C |
E | D | U | G | V | O | I | D | R | C | N | P | M | L | I | G | S | T | J | C | E |
K | R | R | I | J | B | T | P | H | T | I | J | F | V | R | H | N | T | M | H | W |
U | A | E | M | X | U | H | V | I | I | A | A | K | C | B | E | E | L | F | I | S |
B | H | P | A | H | K | V | O | L | P | R | W | Q | H | O | S | V | E | C | N | R |
B | C | D | C | L | E | L | G | L | R | B | H | C | I | V | V | E | S | T | F | I |
W | I | L | F | F | N | I | T | V | G | H | E | J | E | N | L | T | H | G | L | K |
K | R | S | O | D | T | T | L | Y | Q | C | B | U | F | I | O | S | I | R | V | O |
K | V | J | W | M | V | T | G | O | P | E | I | O | C | L | R | V | P | N | P | Q |
L | N | L | S | X | G | L | O | U | K | E | N | Q | O | H | D | E | V | A | L | S |
D | I | P | W | W | R | E | J | N | E | L | X | Q | N | G | A | U | W | D | A | C |
X | L | D | V | D | I | W | A | G | F | V | Y | B | S | U | D | H | E | W | O | Y |
B | L | X | C | Q | F | O | K | K | U | H | J | Y | T | O | V | G | S | F | R | N |
Y | U | L | N | A | F | O | V | A | B | T | X | P | A | L | O | O | T | Q | Q | J |
C | M | G | T | O | I | D | O | S | K | I | X | V | B | C | C | N | O | K | Y | O |
Y | M | X | V | H | T | S | Y | W | M | M | Q | D | L | M | A | O | N | W | J | J |
J | A | P | J | T | H | C | C | A | J | S | V | F | E | K | T | D | L | B | I | F |
F | V | W | I | T | S | I | F | I | N | N | T | M | H | J | E | X | G | M | V | J |
B | O | L | G | Q | V | Y | W | C | C | Y | K | C | X | C | Y | U | L | U | T | M |
Clues
- Burns from the oil lamp were reasonably foreseeable by the defendant therefore everything else was too (6, 1, 4, 8)
- It is not fair, just and reasonable to impose liability on the police to protect every single man (4, 1, 5, 9)
- It was reasonably foreseeable that a person who was ill would be made more illid the ambulance took too long (4, 1, 9)
- Learners must show the same standard as a competent person (10, 1, 6)
- Neighbour Principle (8, 1, 9)
- There was no proximity of time or space but there was of relationship (10, 1, 6)
- There was no sufficient proximity of time, space or relationship (8, 1, 5)
- Thin skull individuals can claim for everything (5, 1, 10)
- Vandles were uncommon, therefore it was an intervening act that would break the chain (5, 1, 11)
- Where a child is alleged to be negligent, the standard of care is lower so they are compared to a child of the same age (6, 1, 8)
Similar Law resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
Report
Report