Other questions in this quiz

2. the act of the defendant must have accelerated the victims death. What is this a requirement of?

  • Factual causation
  • Legal causation
  • Mens rea
  • Medical Novus Actus Interveniens

3. What is the case for direct intent?

  • R v Corbett
  • R v White
  • Chandler v DPP
  • DPP v Newbury

4. In the test for oblique intent, what is the second part?

  • The defendant doesn't have to foresee any harm at all.
  • The jury must feel virtually certain that death or GBH would occur.
  • The defendant must be aware that death or GBH was virtually certain to occur.
  • The defendant doesn't have to foresee that the victim would die.

5. The victim was mentally ill, and ran and fell into a gutter. He was struck by a passing vehicle and killed. It was held this was not reasonably foreseeable. - These are the facts of which case?

  • R v Corbett
  • R v Roberts
  • R v Ball
  • R v JM and SM


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Homicide resources »