HideShow resource information
  • Created by: azdw
  • Created on: 22-12-15 21:05

1. R v White created which test?

  • The 'but for' test for factual causation.
  • The 'reasonable foresight' test for legal causation.
  • The 'substantial and operating cause' test for legal causation.
  • The test for medical Novus Actus Interveniens.
1 of 11

Other questions in this quiz

2. the act of the defendant must have accelerated the victims death. What is this a requirement of?

  • Legal causation
  • Mens rea
  • Factual causation
  • Medical Novus Actus Interveniens

3. The victim was mentally ill, and ran and fell into a gutter. He was struck by a passing vehicle and killed. It was held this was not reasonably foreseeable. - These are the facts of which case?

  • R v JM and SM
  • R v Corbett
  • R v Ball
  • R v Roberts

4. Does recklessness suffice for murder?

  • Yes, as seen in R v Dear
  • No
  • It depends on the circumstances
  • Yes, as seen in the drowning case mentioned earlier.

5. In which case is the test for Oblique intent found?

  • R v Ball
  • R v Woollin
  • R v JM and SM
  • R v Matthew and Alan


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Homicide resources »