Back to quiz

6. The victim was mentally ill, and ran and fell into a gutter. He was struck by a passing vehicle and killed. It was held this was not reasonably foreseeable. - These are the facts of which case?

  • R v JM and SM
  • R v Roberts
  • R v Corbett
  • R v Ball

7. In the test for oblique intent, what is the second part?

  • The jury must feel virtually certain that death or GBH would occur.
  • The defendant doesn't have to foresee that the victim would die.
  • The defendant must be aware that death or GBH was virtually certain to occur.
  • The defendant doesn't have to foresee any harm at all.

8. In which case is the test for Oblique intent found?

  • R v Woollin
  • R v Matthew and Alan
  • R v JM and SM
  • R v Ball

9. Which of the following is an escape case?

  • R v Jones
  • DPP v Newbury Jones
  • R v Corbett
  • R v Ball

10. Does recklessness suffice for murder?

  • No
  • Yes, as seen in the drowning case mentioned earlier.
  • It depends on the circumstances
  • Yes, as seen in R v Dear

11. What is the case for direct intent?

  • Chandler v DPP
  • R v Corbett
  • R v White
  • DPP v Newbury