Causation
- Created by: Dan Edwards
- Created on: 09-01-14 15:10
E | L | S | P | X | X | E | H | I | I | N | N | K | S | B | Y | R |
L | L | I | W | K | K | G | F | G | P | S | K | I | S | I | S | O |
R | T | N | K | U | Q | S | D | T | C | G | X | M | J | N | O | T |
V | P | E | S | T | O | B | A | T | V | C | K | S | P | T | U | W |
H | E | Q | Y | N | F | E | L | E | I | N | E | E | W | E | N | W |
N | F | U | R | T | A | E | L | G | C | V | X | Y | G | R | E | H |
B | O | A | W | E | G | I | O | A | E | R | C | D | N | V | F | N |
C | R | N | H | N | E | F | W | P | J | F | N | R | B | E | X | C |
G | E | O | I | L | T | I | A | B | H | J | B | A | U | N | H | E |
K | S | N | T | A | D | M | Y | O | P | J | F | W | B | I | F | E |
E | E | K | E | M | Y | P | T | A | H | X | A | Y | C | N | L | K |
O | E | N | C | I | T | M | H | S | M | H | C | A | X | G | E | H |
B | A | H | H | N | A | J | A | V | H | B | T | H | I | U | D | C |
G | B | M | E | I | H | S | M | D | Y | A | U | R | H | G | L | P |
N | L | V | I | M | E | E | P | K | M | A | A | G | Y | Q | Q | T |
M | E | N | Q | V | K | V | K | U | O | N | L | C | Y | F | K | D |
G | G | X | O | H | J | D | M | N | L | Q | T | F | U | N | T | U |
Clues
- Causation can only be established if both _____ and legal causation are established (7)
- Latin terminology for the but for test (4, 3, 3)
- Novus Actus Interveniens in English is a new _________ act (11)
- R v ____ (1910) 2 KB 124 created the but for test (5)
- R v ______ (1983) 76 Cr App R - D's conduct must contribute significantly to the result. It need not be the sole cause or even the main cause (6)
- R v ______ [1996] Crim LR 35 - act or omission must be "something more than a slight or trifling link" (6)
- R v _______ (1847) Cox 273 made it clear that the result must be caused by a culpable act (8)
- R v Cato [1976] 1 WLR 110 made it clear in relation to the de minimis rule that there must be a more than _______ cause (7)
- R v Roberts [1971] 56 Cr App R 95 - If the victim responds in a way that a reasonable person could not have predicted, the resulting consequences will not be regarded as reasonably _________ and will be regarded as an independent intervening act. (11)
- The thin skull principle includes physical weakness as defined in R v ______ (1908) 21 Cox CC 692 (7)
Comments
No comments have yet been made