"There is no sensible alternative to nuclear power if we are to sustain civilisation" (50 marks)
- Created by: Emmajayne798
- Created on: 11-05-17 11:18
Fullscreen
7. Dr James Lovelock has written in the context of the need to address climate change at the same time as increasing energy production globally: “There is no sensible alternative to nuclear power if we are to sustain civilization.” To what extent do you agree with this statement and why? (50 marks)
- Need to address climate change has been accepted for many years- Energy Trilemma
- better understanding of science- dangerous for human society- business as usual model= 4.5oC increase by 2100 (Sterman et al, 2015). seen big effects from 1oC since industrial revolution. To prevent dangerous levels of warming >2oC- 80% coal; 1/3 oil and 1/2 proven gas reserves not exploited (McGlade and Ekins, 2015).
- Need to transition to low carbon- this is difficult. Global energy mix= v. similar to that of the 1970's -80% fossil fuels. Reasons for this-fossil fuels= energy dense, cheap and technology and infrastructure=well developed.
- May be easier for countries with stable demand to plan transitions
- However for many countries developing- huge demand increase due to industrialisation and increasing public affluence leading to greater consumption e.g. China- GDP trending at 9% increase per year. In 2014- 140/100 urban homes had a colour TV- more than one per household.
- Energy demand is going to continue to increase- rural populations still behind in terms of consumption. 1.2 billion people (16%) world's population have no access to electricity (World Energy Outlook, 2016). Want better quality of life. Global population continuing to grow- 9 bn in 2050.Need alternative to fossil fuels that can meet demand
- From this perspective- Nuclear may be a sensible alternative.
- Reserves of U-238 in Australia, USA, Canada- politically stable countries- improves energy security.
- Reliable- power stations can run 24/7/365. Low carbon- no atmospheric pollutants produced
- But V.energy dense- fission has the potential to release 1 million times more energy than from a chemical reaction (ITER). Example: Hinkley point C, UK- should provide 7% UK electricity demand.
- Help UK to fulfil it's obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% on 1990 levels by 2050.
- Other hand-contraversial-many …
Comments
No comments have yet been made