Social psychological explanations: Di-individuation

  • De-individuation applied to aggression:
  • AO1:
  • De-individuation refers to reduced sense of personal responsibilty:
  • Zimbardo argued behaviour is usually constrained ny socia norms - aggressive behaviour is usually discouraged. But when we become part of a crowd we lose restraint and may behave in emotional, impulsive and irrational ways - we become de-indiviuated and lose individual self-identity and responsibilty for our own behaviour. responsibility is shared throughout the crowd - we ignore social norms and experience less personal guilt at harmful aggression directed at others. 
  • Anonymity is a major condition of de-indiviuation:
  • Several conditions of de-individuation promote aggression (e.g. darkness, uniforms) - a major one is anonymity. We have less fear of retribution because we are unidentifiable in a crowd - the bigger the growd, the greater the anonymity.  Anonymity provides fewer opportunites for others to judge us negatively.
  • Anonymity reduces private self-awareness:
  • Prentice-Dunn and Rogers argue that anonymity reduces private self-awareness because our attention is focussed outwardly to the events around us. This means that we think less about our own beliefs and feelings - we are less self-critical and evauloative. 
  • Anonymity reduces public self-awareness:
  • Anonymity also reduces public self-awareness because we realise we are anonymous and out behavout is less likely to be judged by others. We no longer care how others see us - we become less accountable for our aggressive and destructive actions. 
  • Key study: Dodd. Student de-individuation:
  • Procedure: Dodd asked psychology students: 'if you could do anything humanly possible with complete assurance that you would nit be detected or held responsible, what would you

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Aggression resources »

Social psychological explanations: Di-individuation

  • De-individuation applied to aggression:
  • AO1:
  • De-individuation refers to reduced sense of personal responsibilty:
  • Zimbardo argued behaviour is usually constrained ny socia norms - aggressive behaviour is usually discouraged. But when we become part of a crowd we lose restraint and may behave in emotional, impulsive and irrational ways - we become de-indiviuated and lose individual self-identity and responsibilty for our own behaviour. responsibility is shared throughout the crowd - we ignore social norms and experience less personal guilt at harmful aggression directed at others. 
  • Anonymity is a major condition of de-indiviuation:
  • Several conditions of de-individuation promote aggression (e.g. darkness, uniforms) - a major one is anonymity. We have less fear of retribution because we are unidentifiable in a crowd - the bigger the growd, the greater the anonymity.  Anonymity provides fewer opportunites for others to judge us negatively.
  • Anonymity reduces private self-awareness:
  • Prentice-Dunn and Rogers argue that anonymity reduces private self-awareness because our attention is focussed outwardly to the events around us. This means that we think less about our own beliefs and feelings - we are less self-critical and evauloative. 
  • Anonymity reduces public self-awareness:
  • Anonymity also reduces public self-awareness because we realise we are anonymous and out behavout is less likely to be judged by others. We no longer care how others see us - we become less accountable for our aggressive and destructive actions. 
  • Key study: Dodd. Student de-individuation:
  • Procedure: Dodd asked psychology students: 'if you could do anything humanly possible with complete assurance that you would nit be detected or held responsible, what would you

Comments

No comments have yet been made