POC1026-Question 2, Violence in World Politics
- Created by: LilyMcAuley
- Created on: 08-01-18 19:59
Fullscreen
Seminar Questions
- What do you Define as violence?
- Is war inevitable?
- How is mass killing and injuring in war legitimated?
- Which forms of violence are considered legitamate?
- -1949 Geneva convention UN, (international war standards) e.g. torture on legitamate under standards.
- Is politics inheritantly violent?
Core Reading- What counts as violence?
Louise Amoore and Marieke de Goede
- Tony Blair justifying Iraq war: Said unline IRA terrorism (unjustified by understandable in a political framework) 9/11 incomprehensible violence.
- E.g. 9/11 terrorists called nihilists, acts seen to be 'irreconcilable with political agendas and beyond the reach of established juridical or ethical codes.'
- Illigitamate violence= Nihilists.
- 9/11, 3,000 died (2 hyjacked planes hit twin towers, 1 landed in field, one was delayed and never took off).
Case Studies:
Drone targeting in Pakistan by the US:
- AfPal border very dangerous.
- Terrorist organisations target area, some a concern for West (real but unspecified threat)
- US killed targeted militants on the border using Drones (UAVs). (Typical have hellfire missiles). Used 30 years.
- 2004-2010, 1,458 militant deaths (531 civilian).
- Obama in washington, strikes doubled.
- Same time military withdrawal from Iraq.
- Drones (alternate to war- form of political violence)
- Legitimised as state self defence.
- Borders US consider areas where they can intervene (with violence) expanding and not nessarily in battle zones.
Finacial Targeting in Pakistan:
- FATF and OECD platforms which foster international cooperation against money laundering.
- FATF important, agenda to cut terrorist funding (war on terror).
- If countries don't take recommendations, may receive negative report from FATF; which may impact country’s credit rating and access to international capital markets.
- Pakistan had bad resports in 2009 and 2010.
- Pakistan was pressured to target terrorists through international pressure (instead of war).
- Finacial sanctions make humanitarian organisations harder to run (e.g. UK Charity Commission guidlines borderline ridiculous to comply to).
- E.g. 2010 floods, disputes over how to get aid to people without letting militant groups getting money and support from traumatised victims.
- E.g. charities such as Islamic relief.
possible finacial sanctions and drone strikes both have violent effects.
Both target precisely and work as new…
Comments
No comments have yet been made