Judiciary and Civil Liberties
- Created by: Sapphire Elizabeth
- Created on: 08-05-16 01:33
Key Concepts
Judiciary:
Judges and courts directly involved in making laws and politics. “3rd Branch of Government”.
Judicial Independence
Members of the Judiciary are independent of political affiliations (parties/movements) and government influence.
Judicial Neutrality
Members of the Judiciary avoid allowing political views affect decisions in cases.
Civil Liberties
Rights and freedoms of citizens in relation to the state and its laws.
Rule of Law
Principe that all citizens (incl. government) are equal and should be treated as under the law.
Key Definitions
Judicial Review
Process whereby courts review decisions by the state/public body in relation to citizens. When outcomes show a citizen has been treated unfairly/abuse of rights, public body/government has exceeded legal powers, the court may set aside the decision.
Judiciary
Judiciary UK – with political significance.
Court
Role
High Court
Some appeals from lower courts; civil (private) disputes; judicial reviews concerning individuals and the state.
Court of Appeals
(Criminal Division)
Appeals from lower criminal courts; some from High Court.
Court of Appeals (Civil Division)
Appeals from count courts; High Court (incl. judicial review)
Supreme Court
Appeals from both appeal courts. Highest in UK.
European Court of Justice
Appeals on European Union Law.
European Court of Human Rights
Appeals on European Convention of Human Rights.
Political Role
The judiciary (3rd Gov. Branch): administering justice in cases of political significance.
Interpretation
When the meaning of a statue is not clear, judges interpret the meaning.
Example: Powers of Government, rights of citizens.
Creating Case Law/Judge-Made Law
When an existing laws application in specific cases is not clear, judges make a decision which is expected to be enforced in similar future cases.
Example: Discrimination cases
Declaring Common Law
When there is no relevant statute law or clear common law to settle a dispute, judges must take evidence and decide what the common law is.
Example: Inheritance matters, commercial practises
Judicial Review
When a citizen/citizens believe they have been mistreated by government/Gov. Agencies, judges review the decisions made by those in question. Achieves 2 democratic objectives:
- Ensures government does not overstep its powers (power check)
- Asserts…
Comments
No comments have yet been made