chapter 6 economic issues 1918-39
- Created by: loupardoe
- Created on: 19-05-18 17:47
Fullscreen
how seriously did the First World War affect economic conditions after 1918?
- WWI was a total war- required considerable economic effort
- taxation was not excessive- 5s in the pound
- war was financed by borrowing, increase in the amount of money put into circulation
- raised prices
- affected British trade- reduced the export and re-export trades
- 1913- exports=£525 million, re-exports=£110 million
- 1918- exports=£501 million, re-exports=£31 million
- some markets were lost to British companies
- Japanese and Indian manufactuers stepped in to provide cheaper and more available products- they were experiencing an industrial revolution, providing new competition for British traders
- invisible exports- lost income from services to trade, sold off some private investments
- very high level of financial support offered to foreign and dominion allies- £2000 million
- financed by loans in the USA and Canada, raising shorter term loans at home via government borrowing
- had to recruit a bigger labour force
- 5 million served in the armed forces
- their place in the workforce was supplied by women, younger workers and older men who delayed retirement
- industrial workforce fell by 5%
- skilled craftsmen were able to negotiate higher wages
- share of wages in national income rose
- demand for war supplies was huge
- 1916- Battle of the Somme saw a million and a half shells fired by very large guns
- 1914- total output of shells=half a million
- Britain needed the products of heavy industry
- engineering, iron, steel, chemicals, coal and agriculture faced a massive need with little foreign compeititon
- Lever Brothers the soap, edible oil and fats company grew to be the 2nd largest manufacturing company, developing margarine as a butter substitute and exporting to the USA
- cotton production and exports rose, shipping was available
- rubber, medical supplies, petrol, glass and the newer electrical goods industries prospered
- led to greater demands for coal
- country saw full employment, diversification of labour, more production, higher wages, some improvement in working conditions, some move to rational economic controls
- it was this growth that was to cause problems in the 1920s and beyond
- pre war developments were reversed
- the profits of the war moved businesses away from plans to restructure industry to meet a smaller demand or introducing new technology to improve productivity and reduce costs to ensure they were competitive
- government provided some temporary relief- subsidies, very large amount of direct government demand, reduction of foreign competition
- in the immediate post war period the government maintained interventions to help ease the transition to peace
- tariff barriers to prevent foreign competition
- suspension of the Gold Standard to allow the pound to be reduced to help exporters
- coal mines continued to be subsidised
- railways were kept in public ownership
- agricultural prices were guaranteed, agricultural wages rose
post war boom
- in the immediaete aftermath of the war there war an economic boom
- economy as a whole flourished
- the demobilised armed forces were reintegrated back into the economy
- pensions and payments to ex servicemen put a lot of money into the economy
- 17000 new agricultural smallholdings were set up
- many new companies established…
Comments
No comments have yet been made