1) Before industrial revolution, families were not extended: Laslett criticised Parsons views and argued that before industrilisation took place, families were not necessarily based around an extended family unit. It was found that 10% of families were extended and the MAJORITY were nuclear
This shows that the reason why families became nuclear so quieckly is because they were ALREADY nuclear before industrilisation took place
O2: However, Laslett has failed to say how much contact family had with extended kin. For example, although nuclear families were common, people still may have contacted extended fam EVERYDAY
2) Nucelar family not isolated: McGlone et al has criticised Parsons for claiming that the nucelar family is not isolated and still keeps contact with their extended kin on advice, grandparents to babysit, family problemlems, etc.
This shows that nuclear family STILL has FREUQENT CONTACT with extneded kin
Similalrly, Brannen shows that in today's society there are many beanpole families where there is a strong link between grandparents, grandchildren and children. Again shows that family has not isolated itself from extended kin
Comments
No comments have yet been made