Milgram Section A

?

Aims and Context

What did Milgram aim to test?

- to find out if poeple would obey to authority in a controlled setting AND to find if the holocaust happened because germans have authoritarian personalities

When were studies liek this carried out and why?

- after WW2 to prevent events like the holocaust happening again

Why did these events occur?

- because people blindly obeyed authority

"these inhumane policies such as the death camps may have orignated in the mind of a single person but they could only be carried out on a massive scale if a very large number of people obeyed orders" (Milgram)

1 of 10

Aims and Context

Why did most researchers say the holocaust happened?

- because germans are 'different' and have authoritarian personalities

What did Adorno suggest?

- personalities are intolerant of minority groups such as jews who are seen as inferior

What causes this type of personality?

- hostility ratings from a harsh upbringing

What happend to this hosility after?

- its displaced onto minority groups

2 of 10

Aims and Context

What did Arendt study?

- case study of Eichmann

Who was Eichmann?

- the nazi responsible for organising transportation of jews to death camps

When was his trial?

- 1961

What did his trial reveal?

- he was not evil, he was dull and normal but he just followed orders

How many jews were sent to death camps by him?

- over 6 million by 1944

3 of 10

Procedures

What was Milgrams research method?

- observing pps under tightly controlled conditions

What was the dependant variable?

- the highest number switch that the pps pressed

How many people were in the sample?

- 40 males ages 20-50

How were they chosen?

- volunteer sampling from advertisement in New Haven Newspaper

The pps had a range of what?

- jobs, from postal clerks to engineers

4 of 10

Procedures

What were they told the research was about?

- memory, learning and punishment

How much were they payed?

- $4.50

How many people took part each time?

- 3, "teacher" (naive pps) "learner" and "experimenter" (confederates)

What happened to the naive pps?

- they always became the teacher

What did all three people do before starting the experiment?

- when into the next room to wire up the learner

5 of 10

Procedures

How big was the sample shock?

- 45v

What did the labels on the shock generator say?

- '***' and 'DANGER: SEVERE SHOCK'

What did the teacher have to do?

- give the learner an electric shock each time they got a word pair wrong

How much did they shocks increase by each time?

- 15v

If the teacher hesitated, what did the experimenter give them?

- prompts such as "the experiment requires that you continue"

6 of 10

Procedures

The teacher thought that the shocks were what?

- real

What could the teach hear in the next room?

- the learner groaning in pain, however after 315v the learner was silent

What did Milgram do to address ethical issues?

- debriefed the pps straight after explaining the real purpose of the experiment and ensured they were in a state of well-being before leaving

7 of 10

Findings and Conclusions

What did psychology students say before starting the experiment?

- only 0-3% of the pps would go up to 450v

How many pressed 450v in the real study?

- 65%

How many stopped before 450v?

- 35%

5 pps withdrew at what voltage?

- 300v

How many pps withdrew at 315v?

- 4

8 of 10

Findings and Conclusions

2 pps withdrew at what voltage?

- 330v

How many pps withdrew at 345v, 360v and 375v?

- 1 each voltage

What signs of extreme stress were shown?

- lip biting, sweating, trembling, laughing nervously

How many pps had siezures?

- 3

What did Milgram find out in the debriefs?

- on a 14 point scale, they rated 14 on how painful they thought the shocks were

9 of 10

Findings and Conclusions

Milgram said people obey authortiy because of what?

- the situation they are in

Why did people obey the experimenter?

- because it was done in a prestigious univeristy (Yale)

Why else did people obey according to Milgram?

- because they were paid, they didnt want to disrupt the study because they thought it was important scientific research

10 of 10

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »