Technological Change - BUSS4 2015 SUMMARY
- Created by: kellyg114
- Created on: 15-04-15 22:09
View mindmap
- Technological Change
- DRIVING FACTORS
- Need for significant boost in efficiency, safety and resource substainability
- Manu. firms across the world rely on efficiency of operations to remain competitive
- Tech change can be source of competitiveness (R&D + innovation) but also a threat
- Especially for complacent market leaders who don't keep up with the tech advancements
- May not be a competitive advantage if competitors exploit the same tech
- Rapid tech change can challenge all competitors
- technology creating advantage e.g.
- new process = produce faster, at lower cost/better quality e.g. online video streaming
- solve a complex problem = do something competitors find hard to master e.g. google search enginge
- new product = first product to market e.g iPad & iPhone
- protect a valuable idea = have something only others can sell if they pay for a licence e.g. Pfizer's Viagra
- rewrite the rules = completely new approach which makes other products/markets redundant e.g. smartphones
- Tech change can be source of competitiveness (R&D + innovation) but also a threat
- Efficiency if important as manu. is capital intensive & has relatively low ROCE
- Factors increasing need for energy & resource efficiency:
- Rising demand for raw materials (incl. energy)
- Uncertainties over energy supply (incl. political instability)
- Increasingly stringent env legislation
- Customer requirement for sustainability
- e.g. Rolls-Royce - world class engine innovation but also rationalization to maintain efficiency
- Manu. firms across the world rely on efficiency of operations to remain competitive
- Rising labor costs pushing greater automation
- e.g China
- Digital factory modelling is reducing product design errors and speeding up "time to market"
- e.g. JLR - showroom technology
- e.g. 3D printing (reduces cost of prototyping & enabling print-on-demand for high-cost components)
- e.g BAE - high investment in R&D and effective use of 3D print to reduce component costs
- 3D PRINTING: process for making a physical object from a 3D model, typically by laying down man successive thin layers of materials
- BENEFITS: Allows bus. to make things at low costs, so costs will decrease. Products finished to higher quality. Less chance of human error.
- THREATS: Jobs aren't satisfying. Patents will expire protecting product/ideas from being copied.
- Machinery & tools need to have greater flexibility
- Increased processing power & sophisticated software
- Need for significant boost in efficiency, safety and resource substainability
- KEY TERMS:
- PRODUCTIVITY: effectiveness of productive effort as measured in terms of rate of output per unit of input
- AUTOMATION: Use/introduction of automatic equipment in a manufacturing or other process or facility:
- MASS CUSTOMIZATION: products are adapted to meet a customers individual needs, so no two items are the same.
- e.g. JAGUAR - 'create the jaguar that's the perfect fit with your lifestyle, driving style and personal tastes" - creates unique SP & attract customers
- creates advantage - ideal for niche segments
- COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING
- ROBOTICS
- YELLOW = key terms PALE RED = company eg.
- OVER TIME:
- Inevitable change over the years to meet increased demands (quality, quantity etc)
- Automation over human labor - reduces human error. Human used in quality assurance.
- e.g. FORD - first automotive company to use mass production in UK & first moving assembly line
- tech shortening product life cycles of established products
- investment in R&D
- UK falling behind other countries in terms of R&D investment and automation
- Can UK manu, expect to compete without heavy investment in tech?
- 1997 - investment in manu. worth £21.6 billion (22% total investment by bus)
- 2012 - manu. worth £13.8 billion (11% total bus investment)
- Can UK manu, expect to compete without heavy investment in tech?
- financing tech change?
- Gov incentives for UK manu. to invest more in tech.
- e.g. HIGH VALUE-ADDED MANUFACTURING CATAPULT CENTRE
- e.g. of Gov policy encouraging tech innovation
- Catapult project
- over £140 million of government investment planned over a six-year period, and investment matched by private industry.
- develop manufacturing echnologies, which can span from raw materials to finished assembly processes
- bridges gap between early innovation (UK trad, strong) + industrial-scale manufacturing, which UK needs to grow to support a healthy and balanced economy.
- e.g. HIGH VALUE-ADDED MANUFACTURING CATAPULT CENTRE
- Gov incentives for UK manu. to invest more in tech.
- e.g. GSK/ AstraZeneca - highest UK investors in R&D = global pharmaceutical sucess
- only 2 UK firms to feature in worlds top 100 R&D investors
- R&D investment in UK concentrated on few key sectors - is this enough?
- Pharmaceutical & biotech = 35%
- Aerospace & defence = 7%
- Software & computer services = 6%
- Automobile & parts = 6%
- Banks = 6%
- Other = 40%
- UK falling behind other countries in terms of R&D investment and automation
- Inevitable change over the years to meet increased demands (quality, quantity etc)
- LINKS:
- Porters five forces: (potential impact of tech)
- Barriers to entry (IMPACTS OF TECH)
- may reduce econmoies of scale - encouraging new entrants (e.g. digital publishing)
- some cases - barriers may rise as products become more complex & processes more difficult to copy
- Substitutes (IMPACTS OF TECH)
- new products may displace old - e.g online streaming for DVD which in turn replaced videotape.
- tech in other markets may 'steal' customer spending from other markets - e.g. more spending on smartphone apps may reduce spending on PC software
- Power of customers & suppliers (IMPACTS OF TECH)
- tech may free bus from a single source of supply - e.g. cloud-based applications v microsoft
- e.g. using google docs (free) rather than spending out on microsoft?
- tech may free bus from a single source of supply - e.g. cloud-based applications v microsoft
- Competitive rivalry (IMPACTS OF TECH)
- rivalry diminished if tech successfully patented & licensed
- EVALUATION: has tech made markets more competitive
- Barriers to entry (IMPACTS OF TECH)
- Porters five forces: (potential impact of tech)
- OPPORTUNITY FOR BETTER BUS MODEL
- Product being sold
- e.g. materials/production process used
- e.g. method of delivery (physical or online)
- e.g. games - rather than physical copies people can now get codes online instantly.
- e,g, extent of customisation
- how product being sold
- e,g, what distribution channel is used (direct v intermediaries)
- e,g, the pricing model (subscription v free)
- how a bus organises its activities to generate income (revenue) and incur costs
- Product being sold
- DRIVING FACTORS
Similar Business Studies resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made