HideShow resource information
  • Created by: val16
  • Created on: 05-03-16 18:19
View mindmap
    • Study to support - Milgram           P-One study that supports the Social Impact Theory is Milgram's study.              E-When the teacher had peer support they were less likely to obey the authority figure's orders.             E-It supports the Social Impact's theory about the social divisional effects. Because the number of targets outnumbers the numbers of source there is less chance of obedience.
    • Supporting Evidence: FORMULA APPLIES TO ALL CULTURES     P- A strength of the theory is that the formula I=F(SIN) can be generalised to all cultures.      E- The idea is that the strength, immediacy and number of the source increases so will the level of obedience.
    • Conflicting evidence:         P- The theory is limited in the type of social situation it is able to explain.            E- The theory suggests that when the strength, immediacy and number of the source increase so does the level of obedience.  E- But the theory cannot help us to understand what would happen, in a situation where the source and the target are equal in strength, immediacy and number.
    • Conflicting Evidence - FACTORS       P- A weakness of the theory is that it has narrowed down obedience as a result of 3 factors.            E- The impact of others involves so many different factors about the social situation such as measuring powers of persuasion or even size of group.              E- It seems that such a wealth of factors cannot be reduced to a mathematical formula.
    • Conflicting Evidence: PRESENCE    P- A weakness of the Social Impact Theory is that it does not look at obedience in particular, but rather social impact.            E- For example, the theory helps to understand why the presence of others, makes them more likely to obey.  E- However the theory can't explain why the change of settings affects the level of obedience.
    • Other Explanations: Individual Differences:     P- A weakness of this theory is that it has failed to account for individual differences.     E- In terms of obedience, this theory suggests that if the source is perceived as a legitimate authority figure who is immediate to the individual and who are greater in number then they will be likely to obey.  E- The theory fails to consider that some people are more likely to resist social impact and some people are more easily influenced.


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Social Psychology resources »