Milgram's studies
- Created by: 11pyoung
- Created on: 13-04-17 10:25
View mindmap
- Milgram's Studies
- Original study
- Aim
- To investigate how willing people were to follow the orders of an authority figure when those orders involved inflicting pain on another person
- Procedure
- An advert was placed in a newspaper asking for 40 male volunteers to take part in a study into how punishment affects learning
- Forty volunteers took part in the controlled study along with 2 confederates
- 1 confederate played the role of the experimenter and the other played the role of the 'learner'
- Each ppt was tested separately. Ppts introduced to the second confederate and told that he was simply another ppt.
- They drew rigged lots to see who was going to be the 'learner' and the 'teacher'
- The ppt and were lead into a room where the learner was strapped into a chair and had electrodes attached to him.
- The ppt was then taken to a separate room where the shock generator was situated.
- Experimenter stayed in the same room as ppt
- The ppt was then taken to a separate room where the shock generator was situated.
- The ppt was told that he must administer increasingly strong electric shocks to the learner each time they go an answer worng
- The strength of shock on the generator ranged form 15-450 volts
- Increasing in 15 volt increments
- As the experiment progressed and the shocks given by the ppts got stronger the ppts heard the learner's cries of pain
- As the shocks got stronger the confederate demanded to be released and said that his heart was 'bothering him'
- Repeated many times along with the increasingly severe cries of pain and the learner refusing to carry on
- From 315V the learner fell completely silent and was not heard again by the ppts
- None of the screams were real; pre-recorded on a tape
- From 315V the learner fell completely silent and was not heard again by the ppts
- From 315V the learner fell completely silent and was not heard again by the ppts
- None of the screams were real; pre-recorded on a tape
- Repeated many times along with the increasingly severe cries of pain and the learner refusing to carry on
- As the shocks got stronger the confederate demanded to be released and said that his heart was 'bothering him'
- Each time the ppt wanted to leave the experimenter the 'experimenter' would prompt them to continue, ranging from a simple 'Please continue' to a demanding 'You have no choice you must go on'
- Results
- All ppts gave shocks up to 300V
- 65% continued up to 450V
- 65% continued up to 450V
- All ppts gave shocks up to 300V
- Conclusion
- Findings demonstrate that ordinary people are capable of committing inhumane acts when told to do so by an authority figure
- Application
- Milgram's research gave insight in how awful things like the holocaust could have occurred and that this insight may reduce the risk of it happening again
- Aim
- Follow-up Studies
- Telephone Instructions
- The experiment was the same except the experimenter was not in the room but gave their instructions over the phone
- Obedience level: 22%
- Rundown office
- Same experiment but conducted in a rundown office building to reduce the sense of prestige the experiment had
- Obedience level: 48%
- Ordinary man gives orders
- When a confederate in the study was not perceived to be in a position of authority gave instructions whilst the experimenter was out of the room
- Obedience level: 20%
- Presence of allies
- Ppts given support by 2 other teachers who refused to obey
- Obedience level: 10%
- Telephone Instructions
- Evaluation
- Highly controlled experiments
- Highly replicable
- All ppts subject to the same conditions in each experiment
- All ppts subject to the same conditions in each experiment
- Highly replicable
- High reliability
- Similar findings obtained when experiment was repeated
- Obedience was clearly operationalised and easy to measure
- Low generalisability due to:
- unrepresentative sample used
- Unrealistic setting
- Many serious breaches of ethical guidelines
- Lack of informed consent
- Deception
- Causing psychological harm
- Compromising the right to withdraw
- Highly controlled experiments
- Original study
Comments
No comments have yet been made