Milgram's studies

?
  • Created by: 11pyoung
  • Created on: 13-04-17 10:25
View mindmap
  • Milgram's Studies
    • Original study
      • Aim
        • To investigate how willing people were to follow the orders of an authority figure when those orders involved inflicting pain on another person
      • Procedure
        • An advert was placed in a newspaper asking for 40 male volunteers to take part in a study into how punishment affects learning
        • Forty volunteers took part in the controlled study along with 2 confederates
          • 1 confederate played the role of the experimenter and the other played the role of the 'learner'
        • Each ppt was tested separately. Ppts introduced to the second confederate and told that he was simply another ppt.
          • They drew rigged lots to see who was going to be the 'learner' and the 'teacher'
        • The ppt and were lead into a room where the learner was strapped into a chair and had electrodes attached to him.
          • The ppt was then taken to a separate room where the shock generator was situated.
            • Experimenter stayed in the same room as ppt
        • The ppt was told that he must administer increasingly strong electric shocks to the learner each time they go an answer worng
        • The strength of shock on the generator ranged form 15-450 volts
          • Increasing in 15 volt increments
        • As the experiment progressed and the shocks given by the ppts got stronger the ppts heard the learner's cries of pain
          • As the shocks got stronger the confederate demanded to be released and said that his heart was 'bothering him'
            • Repeated many times along with the increasingly severe cries of pain and the learner refusing to carry on
              • From 315V the learner fell completely silent and was not heard again by the ppts
                • None of the screams were real; pre-recorded on a tape
            • From 315V the learner fell completely silent and was not heard again by the ppts
              • None of the screams were real; pre-recorded on a tape
        • Each time the ppt wanted to leave the experimenter the 'experimenter' would prompt them to continue, ranging from a simple 'Please continue' to a demanding 'You have no choice you must go on'
      • Results
        • All ppts gave shocks up to 300V
          • 65% continued up to 450V
        • 65% continued up to 450V
      • Conclusion
        • Findings demonstrate that ordinary people are capable of committing inhumane acts when told to do so by an authority figure
      • Application
        • Milgram's research gave insight in how awful things like the holocaust could have occurred and that this insight may reduce the risk of it happening again
    • Follow-up Studies
      • Telephone Instructions
        • The experiment was the same except the experimenter was not in the room but gave their instructions over the phone
        • Obedience level: 22%
      • Rundown office
        • Same experiment but conducted in a rundown office building to reduce the sense of prestige the experiment had
        • Obedience level: 48%
      • Ordinary man gives orders
        • When a confederate in the study was not perceived to be in a position of authority gave instructions whilst the experimenter was out of the room
        • Obedience level: 20%
      • Presence of allies
        • Ppts given support by 2 other teachers who refused to obey
        • Obedience level: 10%
    • Evaluation
      • Highly controlled experiments
        • Highly replicable
          • All ppts subject to the same conditions in each experiment
        • All ppts subject to the same conditions in each experiment
      • High reliability
        • Similar findings obtained when experiment was repeated
      • Obedience was clearly operationalised and easy to measure
      • Low generalisability due to:
        • unrepresentative sample used
        • Unrealistic setting
      • Many serious breaches of ethical guidelines
        • Lack of informed consent
        • Deception
        • Causing psychological harm
        • Compromising the right to withdraw

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Conformity resources »