Meta-Ethics
Mind-map of Meta-Ethics abour Cognitive and Non-Cognitive as well as Naturalistic Fallacy. The first two of 7 individual meta ethical approaches.
- Created by: Soka12
- Created on: 15-05-14 10:15
View mindmap
- Meta Ethics
- Naturalistic Fallacy
- Linked to David Hume's claim called the 'is-ought-gap'
- One cannot move from a factual statement to an ought statement
- Only two types of meaningful statements
- Synthetic- Deal with experience
- Analytic- Deal with definitions
- Linked to David Hume's claim called the 'is-ought-gap'
- Cognitive and Non-Cognitive
- Non-Cognitive
- Subjective- cannot be proved
- Do not see moral values as something that can be discovered.
- Cognitive
- Objective- statements made are known to be true or false
- Kant-reason enables us to discover ethical laws
- Non-Cognitive
- Naturalistic Fallacy
- Cognitive
- Objective- statements made are known to be true or false
- Kant-reason enables us to discover ethical laws
Comments
No comments have yet been made