A level - Memory
- Created by: Make7M
- Created on: 03-06-18 13:50
View mindmap
- Memory
- System in which the mind stores and remembers information
- Research into
- Coding
- Baddeley (1966) coding of STM and LTM
- Gave different list of words to 4 groups of participants to remember
- 1. acoustically (sound) similar 2.acoustically different 3.semantically (mean) similar 4.semantically different
- Participants were either asked to recall the words immediately (STM, did worse with acoustically similar words) or after 20 min (LTM, did worse with semantically similar words)
- Found STM codes acoustically, and LTM codes semantically
- Participants were either asked to recall the words immediately (STM, did worse with acoustically similar words) or after 20 min (LTM, did worse with semantically similar words)
- 1. acoustically (sound) similar 2.acoustically different 3.semantically (mean) similar 4.semantically different
- Not always true that STM coded semantically
- Frost (1972) found LT recall was related to visual and semantic categories
- Nelson and Rothbart (1972) found evidence of acoustic coding in LTM
- Meaning that coding can vary according to circumstances
- Nelson and Rothbart (1972) found evidence of acoustic coding in LTM
- Frost (1972) found LT recall was related to visual and semantic categories
- Gave different list of words to 4 groups of participants to remember
- Baddeley (1966) coding of STM and LTM
- Capacity
- Jacobs (1887) of STM
- Asked participants to recall digits in the correct order aloud, if they get the number correct, they are asked to recall a number 1 digit longer, determining the individuals digit span
- Found mean span for digits 9.3, and for letters 7.3
- Asked participants to recall digits in the correct order aloud, if they get the number correct, they are asked to recall a number 1 digit longer, determining the individuals digit span
- Miller
- Made observations of everyday practice, noticed that things come in 7 sevens, suggested capacity of STM is 7 (±2)
- Found people can recall 5 words as well as they can recall 5 letters, by chunking
- Cownan (2001) criticised findings into capacity of STM, as he found that it is limited to about 4 chunks
- Shows capacity for visual information (rather than verbal) meaning that lower end of Millers range is more appropriate 5
- Made observations of everyday practice, noticed that things come in 7 sevens, suggested capacity of STM is 7 (±2)
- Jacobs (1887) of STM
- Duration
- Peterson and Peterson STM
- Asked 24 psychology students to recall trigrams (3 consonant syllables) whilst asked to count backwards in 3's from a random number, to prevent rehearsal
- Recalled 80% of trigrams after 3 sec delay, 10% after 18 sec
- Asked to count backwards to prevent rehearsal
- Reitman (1974) used auditory tones rather than numbers, found duration was longer
- Meaning forgetting was due to the numbers being overwritten, rather than decaying over time, therefore lacks internal validity
- Reitman (1974) used auditory tones rather than numbers, found duration was longer
- Asked 24 psychology students to recall trigrams (3 consonant syllables) whilst asked to count backwards in 3's from a random number, to prevent rehearsal
- Bahrick (1975) LTM
- Tested almost 400 participants aged 17-74 on: free recall test (remember names of people in graduate class), photo recognition test (of 50 photos), name recognition test (of ex-school friends)
- Found those tested within 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate for names and faces, whilst after 48 years 80% names, 70% faces
- Found free recall was worse, after 15 years it was 60%, and 30% after 47 years
- Found those tested within 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate for names and faces, whilst after 48 years 80% names, 70% faces
- Tested almost 400 participants aged 17-74 on: free recall test (remember names of people in graduate class), photo recognition test (of 50 photos), name recognition test (of ex-school friends)
- Peterson and Peterson STM
- Coding
- Models
- Structure of memory, in simpler form, in way it can be understood
- MSM
- By Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) viewed memory as a 'flow of information' through 'series of unitary stores'
- Sensory
- STM
- LTM
- Retrieval
- Maintenance rehearsal
- Forgetting
- Pro-longed rehearsal
- LTM
- From the environment
- Sensory registers Iconic (visually) and Echoic (auditory), both high capacity, >0.5 sec duration
- Forgetting
- Attention
- STM
- Evaluation
- Supported by studies, that STM and LTM are different
- Coded differently, shows they are separate in the way they code inforamtion
- States stores are unitary, however evidence from patients suffering with amnesia shows this is not true
- KF suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident affecting STM, mainly verbal not visual information
- Meaning that the MSM is too simplistic
- KF suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident affecting STM, mainly verbal not visual information
- Evidence against LTM being a unitary store
- Reasearch suggests we have a different LTM store for facts about the world and learnt skills
- Meaning LTM store is too simplistic
- Reasearch suggests we have a different LTM store for facts about the world and learnt skills
- Supported by studies, that STM and LTM are different
- WMM
- By Baddeley and Hitch (1974) interested in explaining STM, as MSM was criticised for being too simplistic
- Refers to part of mind that is active whilst temporary storing and working on information
- Each store different for coding and capacity
- Sensory
- STM
- LTM
- Central Executive
- Phonological loop
- Deals with auditory information, preserves order information arrives at, stores words heard
- 2 sec duration
- Episodic buffer
- Temporary store for visual, spatial and verbal information, records events (episodes) (added 2000)
- Capacity 4 chunks
- Temporary store for visual, spatial and verbal information, records events (episodes) (added 2000)
- Deals with auditory information, preserves order information arrives at, stores words heard
- Episodic buffer
- Temporary store for visual, spatial and verbal information, records events (episodes) (added 2000)
- Capacity 4 chunks
- Temporary store for visual, spatial and verbal information, records events (episodes) (added 2000)
- Visuo-spatial sketchpad
- Stores visual and spatial information, records arrangement of objects in visual field
- Capacity 3/4 chunks
- Stores visual and spatial information, records arrangement of objects in visual field
- Monitors incoming data, allocates systems to tasks, makes decisions
- Very limited capacity
- Phonological loop
- STM
- Evaluation
- KF motorcycle accident supports STM
- Verbal affected not visual
- Shows the stores are separate
- Verbal affected not visual
- Baddeley described participants had harder time doing two visuals tasks rather than doing visual and verbal task at the same time
- Easier to do tasks at the same time that require different systems, supports separate stores
- Argued that the central executive doesn't explain anything, even tho being the most important part
- Therefore it needs more clarity, some argue is consists of different components
- KF motorcycle accident supports STM
- Types of LTM
- Semantic - knowledge based, facts
- Less personal
- Episodic - time stamped event memories
- Have to be conscious at the time to be able to recall
- Procedural - Learnt skills
- Tulving (1985) recognised that the MSM view of LTM was too simplistic
- Evaluation
- Clive Wearing
- Remembers playing piano (procedural) and being married and having kids (semantic), but does not remember any events (episodic)
- Showing that there are multiple stores
- Remembers playing piano (procedural) and being married and having kids (semantic), but does not remember any events (episodic)
- Neuroimaging evidence
- Evidence showing different types of LTM stored in different parts of the brain
- Tulving (1994) had participants carry out various tasks whilst connected to a PET scanner
- Found episodic (right hemisphere) and semantic (left hemisphere) stored in PFC,
- Procedural in Cerebellum and Basal ganglia
- Others studies found supporting evidence for this, inc. validity
- Procedural in Cerebellum and Basal ganglia
- Found episodic (right hemisphere) and semantic (left hemisphere) stored in PFC,
- Tulving (1994) had participants carry out various tasks whilst connected to a PET scanner
- Evidence showing different types of LTM stored in different parts of the brain
- Real life applications
- Belleville (2006) showed that episodic memories can be improved in older people who had mild cognitive impairment
- Trained participants did better than control, on test of episodic memory
- Belleville (2006) showed that episodic memories can be improved in older people who had mild cognitive impairment
- Clive Wearing
- Semantic - knowledge based, facts
- Explanations of forgetting
- Interference
- Pro-active interference
- When old memory interferes with new
- Retro-active interference
- When new memory interferes with old
- When memories conflict with each other, we forget either or both, as they become distorted, leading to forgetting
- Effects of similarity
- McGeoch and McDonald (1931) had groups remember a list of words 100% accurately, then learn new list
- - Synonyms - Antonyms - Unrelated words - Meaningless syllables - 3 digit numbers - No new list
- Found synonyms (similar words) had worst effect on recall 1.2, those who didn't have to learn a list new had 4.5 recall
- Evaluation
- Support from lab studies
- Unrealistic stimulus
- Evidence from Baddeley and Hitch (1977)
- McGeoch and McDonald (1931) had groups remember a list of words 100% accurately, then learn new list
- Pro-active interference
- Retrieval failure
- Tulving (1983) ESP encoding specifically principle
- The cue has to be present when we learn and retrieve the memory
- External cues - Context dependent learning
- Godden and Baddeley studied sea divers, found recall was 40% lower in non--matching conditions
- Internal cues - State dependent learning
- Carter and Cassady (1998) studied anti-histamines, found they performed worse in non-matching conditions
- External cues - Context dependent learning
- The cue has to be present when we learn and retrieve the memory
- Due to insufficient 'cues', the memory exists but cannot be retrieved
- Evaluation
- Recall vs recognition
- Weak effect of context
- Research support
- Tulving (1983) ESP encoding specifically principle
- Interference
- Factors affecting Eye Witness Testimony
- Misleading information
- Gabbert (2003)
- Leading questions
- Loftus and Palmer (1974)
- Post event discussion (PED)
- Untitled
- Evaluation
- Applications
- Artificial tasks
- Supporting evidence
- Anxiety
- Evaluation
- Misleading information
- Improving Eye Witness testimony
- Untitled
Comments
No comments have yet been made