Sociology-Material deprivation

?
  • Created by: Daisymac
  • Created on: 17-01-19 19:34
View mindmap
  • Material deprivation
    • Housing
      • Direct effect; Harder for the child to study as there is less room for educational activities and nowhere to do homework, disturbed sleep from sharing beds
        • Young children's development can be impaired through lack of space for safe play and exploration.
      • Indirect effects-Children in crowed homes run at a greater risk of accidents, and damp may weaken immune system.Families from tempory housing may suffer more psychological stress---> Off school
    • Diet and health
      • Howard 2001 notes that young people from poorer homes have lower intakes of energy, vitamins and minerals. Poor nutrition effects health, resulting in absences
      • Wilkinson 1996 notes that amongst 10 year olds, the lower the social class, the higher the rate of hyperactivity, anxiety and conduct disorders
      • Blanden and Machin 2007 found children form low income familis were more likely to engage in externalising behaviour , such as fighting, which are likely to disrupt schooling
    • Financial supports and costs of education
      • Bull 1980- Refers to the equiptment and school trips as the costs of free schooling
      • Tanner et al 2003 found that the cost of items place a heavy burden on poorer families
      • Hand-me-downs and cheaper but unfashionable equipment may result in being isolated or bullied
        • Flaherty- explains why 20% eligible for free school meals do not take up entitlement
      • Smith and Noble 1995 add that poverty acts as a barrier to learning, such as inability to afford private schooling or tuition
      • Ridge found that children with jobs has a negative impact on schoolwork
    • Fear of debt
      • Callender and jackson 2005 found wc students were more debt averse
      • Increase in tuition fees in 2012 to £9000 per year --> UCAS 2012 uk applicants fell by 8.6%
      • A national union of students 2010- Survey of 3863 uni students found 81% of those from highest social class received help from home , against 43% from wc
      • Reay 2005 found wc students were more likely to apply to local universities so they could live at home and save money and so limiting their opportunities

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Education resources »