UDAM INVOLUNTARTY MANSLAUGHTER CASES quizsearch LAW 03 0.0 / 5 ? LawCriminal lawA2/A-levelAQA Created by: abic1Created on: 28-02-18 18:12 Act must be criminal FRANKLIN 1 of 18 Not valid defence to argue didn’t want to injure victim so long as established assault or battery LARKIN 2 of 18 Objective test CHURCH 3 of 18 No unlawful act = no UDAM AROBIEKE 4 of 18 Defendant does not have to know their actions were unlawful NEWBURY & JONES 5 of 18 Reasonable man knows as much as the defendant at time of killing DAWSON 6 of 18 Act can be committed indirectly MITCHELL 7 of 18 Guilty even if death partly attributable to medical condition LYNCH 8 of 18 Only needs to make a significantt contribution SHOHID 9 of 18 No fresh intervening cause GOODFELLOW 10 of 18 Victim breaks chain if self inject drugs DALBY 11 of 18 Supplier of drugs is not guilty KENNEDY 12 of 18 If defendant administered drugs they are guilty CATO 13 of 18 Self injection breaks chain of causation DIAS 14 of 18 Guilty of series of unlawful acts LE BRRUN 15 of 18 Only need mens rea for unlawful act LARKIN 16 of 18 Not have to forsee risk of any harm NEWBURY & JONES 17 of 18 Transferred malice LATIMER 18 of 18
Comments
No comments have yet been made