TORT QUIZ
- Created by: rada16
- Created on: 17-01-18 12:27
Other questions in this quiz
2. Fuel oil spilled on water in harbour, caught alight by welding work, claimants ship burnt down. damage done was result of negligent spilling but judge said it was not a forseeable incident.
- Ogwu v Taylor (1987)
- Smith v Stages (1989)
- Overseas Tankship (UK) LTD v Morts Dock (Wagon Mound) (1961)
- Smith v Leech Brain Co (1962)
3. Claimant injured walking next to a cricket stadium by ball that hit him. Only happened 6 times in 35 years so judge deemed claimant unable to prove case as risk was too small.
- Bolton v Stone(1951)
- Sayers v Harlow UDC (1957)
- Froom v Butcher (1976)
- Owens v Brimmel (1976)
4. 3 watchmen called hospital of sickness after drinking tea. Doctor didn't check them-told them to see GP.Claimants husband died later, she can claim duty of care owed but evidence says when reached hospital was too late,not doctors resulting damage.
- Hilton v Thomas Burton (1961)
- Hughes v Lords advocate (1963)
- Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Committee (1961)
- Smith v Stages (1989)
5. Case where mototcycle crash killed cyclist, pregnant woman saw blood led to her losing baby, tried to sue dead cyclist estate but couldn't,not a proximate and sufficient elationship between 2 partiesand cant be in others mind, unlikely, caparo test
- Bourhill v Young (1943)
- Paris v Stepney Borough Council (1951)
- Bolton v Stone (1951)
- Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
Comments
No comments have yet been made