Back to quiz

6. Hume argues further that, if a house and universe are similar, just as we'd blame the builder for a faulty house can we blame a faulty designer.. why does Paley disagree?

  • this argument would be inconsistent with his rejection of analogy
  • a builder cannot be forever responsible for problems as time creates problems, the world began perfect
  • the issue was whether the universe showed design and not quality concerning the design
  • Paley did not dispute this argument, Flew did

7. Can Hume's analogy criticism apply to Aquinas?

  • No, only Paley
  • No but they can on the occasion of his arrow analogy
  • Yes

8. Who put forward the 'aesthetic argument?'

  • Paley
  • Tennant
  • Aquinas
  • Swinburne

9. Other than Paley's analogy of the watch what evidence can be used to show support of design?

  • Mountain and paws
  • Eyeball and Fish fins
  • Eyeball and mountains
  • Camera and hands/paws

10. What was the issue of using Paley's watch analogy with God?

  • We cannot use language to describe God so we cannot describe him with something we can describe
  • Watches are the effects of evolution, over millions of years people were unable to create such, and as skills passed it was learnt and so is not applicable with God
  • If you do not believe elements of the analogy are comparable, you cannot argue that the causes are similar and the analogy would not work
  • Effectively, God created watches

11. Is Hume doubting the belief in God in the teleological argument?

  • Yes, there is no God
  • No, only that it cannot show God exists
  • Yes as there are other reasons to explain design

12. Who argued that the world was one of chance and natural selection

  • Swinburne
  • Flew
  • Darwin
  • Mill