No but they can on the occasion of his arrow analogy
Yes
7. Mills argument took the basis of that if the world is designed by a loving God?.. (finish sentence)
why are there imperfections in the world?
why is nature so cruel?
why does God not reveal himself?
8. What was the issue of using Paley's watch analogy with God?
Watches are the effects of evolution, over millions of years people were unable to create such, and as skills passed it was learnt and so is not applicable with God
If you do not believe elements of the analogy are comparable, you cannot argue that the causes are similar and the analogy would not work
We cannot use language to describe God so we cannot describe him with something we can describe
Effectively, God created watches
9. Is Hume doubting the belief in God in the teleological argument?
No, only that it cannot show God exists
Yes as there are other reasons to explain design
Yes, there is no God
10. What was the 'anthropic principle'?
if the world was due to chance and natural selection then why are there still malfunctions in human life
such conditions (in reply to evolution) cannot be down to chance
beauty is existing around the world which cannot be due to natural selection
11. Darwin's book was called 'The Origin of Species'?
True
False
12. Hume argues further that, if a house and universe are similar, just as we'd blame the builder for a faulty house can we blame a faulty designer.. why does Paley disagree?
Paley did not dispute this argument, Flew did
the issue was whether the universe showed design and not quality concerning the design
a builder cannot be forever responsible for problems as time creates problems, the world began perfect
this argument would be inconsistent with his rejection of analogy
