The persistence of war (104) 0.0 / 5 ? Government & PoliticsIRUniversityNone Created by: AnnagcCreated on: 06-05-21 13:24 What is the 'Thucydides Trap'? A rising power confronting an established power 1 of 18 What are the two types of war? (Vasquez 1996) Wars of rivalry (between equals), wars of inequality (wars between unequals) 2 of 18 What is a total war? (Vasquez 2009 - 1st dimension) Huge societal mobilisations and serious political change e..g destruction of another state, removal of gov etc 3 of 18 What is a limited war? (Vasquez 2009 - 1st dimension) Fewer resources and personnel, marginal changes in territory, economics or political rights 4 of 18 What is a dyadic war? (Vasquez 2009 - 2nd dimension) A war between two actors 5 of 18 What is a complex war? (Vasquez 2009 - 2nd dimension) Wars between 3 or more actors 6 of 18 Bandura's social learning theory (individual level theory) Aggression is learned from social environment e.g. home, family, peers, religion etc, role models are important, reinforcement is important 7 of 18 Steps to war theory (Vasquez 1996) (state level theory) Starts with territorial conflict, depends on how this problem is dealt with if war happens, if response is force the crises follow, often leads to war 8 of 18 Polarity theory (system level theory) How the distribution of power influences stability and peacefulness (realist theory) 9 of 18 Deutsch and Singer (1964) Multipolarity More power means more interaction opportunities which help peace and attention is diffused rather than concentrated 10 of 18 Waltz (1964) Bipolarity Caution is generated by the possibility that anything could erupt into conflict between only two actors 11 of 18 Wohlforth (1999) Unipolarity Hegemonic rivalry is removed, lack of ambiguity 12 of 18 Monteiro (2009, 2011) argument against unipolarity it provides incentives for other types of wars e.g. unipole against other states or other states only 13 of 18 What is a Militarized interstate dispute? conflict short of war directed at another states government, official representatives, official forces, property or territory 14 of 18 Maoz (2004) 4 groups of states - Pacifists states that did not engage in any conflict throughout their history 15 of 18 Maoz (2004) 4 groups of states - normal states that have engaged in a little sporadic conflict during their history 16 of 18 Maoz (2004) - conflict prone states that have engaged in relatively high amounts of conflict during their history but conflict is sporadic not sustained 17 of 18 Moaz (2004) - fightaholics states engaged in excessively high amounts of conflict in a sustained manner 18 of 18
Comments
No comments have yet been made