The Ontological Argument 0.0 / 5 ? Religious StudiesPhilosophyTraditional arguments for the existence of GodASOCR Created by: theblazingoptimistCreated on: 09-02-16 15:55 Who originally created the ontological argument? Anselm 1 of 30 What is the first step of Anselm's first ontological argument? God =greatest concievable being. 2 of 30 What is the second step of Anselm's first ontological argument? God not this if only existent in mind → being > God could exist in reality. 3 of 30 What is the third step of Anselm's first ontological argument? Therefore God must exist in mind + reality. 4 of 30 What does "neccesary" mean? Eternal, depending on nothing else to exist 5 of 30 What does "contingent" mean? Comes in/out of existence, dep. on others. 6 of 30 What is the first step of Anselm's second ontological argument? God = GCB. 7 of 30 What is the second step of Anselm's second ontological argument? God = unsurpassable in every way, w/ neccesary existence. 8 of 30 What is the third step of Anselm's second ontological argument? Therefore God exists neccesarily. 9 of 30 What is the first step of Descartes' ontological argument? God has all perfections. 10 of 30 What is the second step of Descartes' ontological argument? Existence is a perfection. 11 of 30 What is the third step of Descartes' ontological argument? God exists. 12 of 30 What did Descartes believe we were born w/ an innate understanding of? Things like cause,shape, number, GOD 13 of 30 Explain Descartes' use of a triangle in his ontological argument. Has to have three sides and 180°; part of triangle essence.W/o these - not triangle. 14 of 30 What did Kant believe about existence? It's not a predicate. 15 of 30 What did Kant believe about the statement "God exists"? ✗analytic statement; thinking of concept which isn't actualised 16 of 30 How does Kant use the example of a unicorn in his ontological argument "White" + "one horn" = predicates. + "exists" doesn't actualise concept. 17 of 30 Explain how Gaunilo used the example of an island to criticise Anselm's argument. Perfect island exists in mind as we understand concept. Island in mind < island in mind + reality → if this is the case, island must exist in reality 18 of 30 What was Anselm's response to Gaunilo? His criticism doesn't work as God is neccesary wehre an island is contingent 19 of 30 What does Aquinas believe about God? Not self-evident, unknowable to human mind, poss. to have concept of non-existence of God 20 of 30 What is the first step of Norman Malcolm's ontological argument? God = eternal; doesn't exist today then never will. 21 of 30 What is the second step of Norrman Malcolm's ontological argument? God must exist necessarily. 22 of 30 What is the third step of Norman Malcolm's ontological argument? God's existence = imposs./necc. 23 of 30 What is the fourth step of Norman Malcolm's ontological argument? God existence✗ imposs (isn't self-contradictory) 24 of 30 What is the fifth step of Norman Malcolm's ontological argument? God exists necessarily. 25 of 30 What is the first step of Alvin Platinga's ontological argument? There's a possible world w/ being w/ maximal greatness (exists in all poss. worlds). 26 of 30 What is the second step of Alvin Platinga's ontological argument? Our world = poss. world, being exists in it. 27 of 30 What is the third step of Alvin Plantinga's ontological argument? God exists 28 of 30 What is a synthetic argument? Truth only establishable by looking for evidence 29 of 30 What is an analytic argument? Statement true by definition, e.g "all ravens are black" 30 of 30
Comments
No comments have yet been made