The crazy contract ka-wizz!

?
  • Created by: Beth
  • Created on: 12-12-16 15:11

1. Which case demonstrated that it possible to gain damages from the loss of a chance?

  • Chaplin v Hicks [1911 - 13]
  • RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molerei Alois Müller GmbH & Co (UK Production) [2010]
  • Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise - [1976]
  • Misa v Currie (1876)
1 of 14

Other questions in this quiz

2. In which of the following cases, was an invitation to treat found, partially through the lack of detail?

  • Fisher v Bell [1961]
  • Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893]
  • Currie v Misa (1876)
  • Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise - [1976]

3. From which case does the business efficacy test come?

  • RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molerei Alois Müller GmbH & Co (UK Production) [2010]
  • Chapleton v Barry UDC
  • BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977)
  • Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940]

4. From which case does the bystander test come?

  • Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940]
  • BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977)
  • The Moorcock (1889)
  • Chapelton v Barry UDC [1940]

5. Which case showed that consideration need not be reasonable to be good?

  • Partridge v Crittenden [1968]
  • Chaplin v Hicks [1911 - 1913]
  • Chappell v Nestle (1960)
  • Currie v Misa (1876)
View more questions

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Contract resources »