What is the procedure of cutting the brains way of communicating between the two hemipsheres?
commissurotomy
3 of 13
In describing what you see, what visual field could easily describe what was seen?
Right
4 of 13
In describing what you see, what visual field created the illusions (for the participatnts) that the object was not there?
Left
5 of 13
the specific Visual filed that could not describe the object becasue the ............. hemisphere usually lacks language centres.
Right
6 of 13
In recognition by touch, which visual field could not name them but could select a matching object using the corrosponding sided hand.
Left
7 of 13
In composite words and matching faces, what hemisphere could verbally desribe the half of a face.
Left
8 of 13
In composite words and mathcing faces, what hemisphere could select a matching picture to the face shown?
Right
9 of 13
The researcher had created a good methodology because the procedure was ..............
standardised
10 of 13
As Sperry only used 11 patients, who allhad variations and a history of seizures, making it harder to ............... his findings
generalise
11 of 13
Sperrys research may have overstated the differences in hemispheric functions, with many pschologists calling his reseach ...... ......................... literature
pop-psychological
12 of 13
Sperry's work started a debate about the nature of the brain were ................ suggested the hemisphers are so functioanlly differnet thay represent a form of duality in the brain.
Pucetti
13 of 13
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What was cut in the participants brains?
Back
Corpus callosum
Card 3
Front
What is the procedure of cutting the brains way of communicating between the two hemipsheres?
Back
Card 4
Front
In describing what you see, what visual field could easily describe what was seen?
Back
Card 5
Front
In describing what you see, what visual field created the illusions (for the participatnts) that the object was not there?
Comments
No comments have yet been made