Romanian orphan studies AO1 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyAttachmentA2/A-levelAQA Created by: dots_balCreated on: 20-03-22 15:37 Who conducted the ERA study? Rutter 1 of 16 Outline the procedure of the ERA study 165 orphans longitudinal assessed at various ages for cognitive/physical/emotional development control group of British adoptees 2 of 16 IQs if adopted at <6months, 6-24months and 2+years 102, 88, 77 3 of 16 What did the children show upon arrival in the UK malnourishment, delayed intellectual development 4 of 16 What attachment style did they show if they were adopted after 6 months disinhibited (clingy to everyone) 5 of 16 What did Rutter conclude Institutionalisation can delay intellectual development but can be made up for if the child is placed in good care in under 6 months 6 of 16 What was Zeanah's research The Bucharest Early intervention project 7 of 16 What did his sample consist of? 95 Romanian children aged 12-31months control of 50 who had never been in care 8 of 16 what percentage of Romanian children were securely attached compared to the control? 19% compared to 74% 9 of 16 what percentage of Romanian children were disinhibited attached compared to the control? 44% compared to <20% 10 of 16 Who did PET scans on Romanian Orphans Chugani 11 of 16 What was he looking at PFC 12 of 16 What type of scans did Kings College do MRI 13 of 16 How much smaller were the orphans brains? 8.6% smaller 14 of 16 What was a strength of Rutter's method (3 points) -Longitudinal -no ppt variables -clear cause & effect 15 of 16 What is a final strength (PEE) -RWA -Langton- UK -Sparling-Romania -improve conditions 16 of 16
Comments
No comments have yet been made