research methods

?
  • Created by: Lndavies
  • Created on: 18-05-19 11:44
reliabilty
This refers to the consistency of the findings.
1 of 30
internal reliablity and how its measured
refers to the consistency of the results of a test across items within the test. do split half method to see if you get the same results in the second half of the test.
2 of 30
external reliablity and how its tested
refers to the extent to which the a test cores varies from one to another. for this do a test retest to see if the result you get on the first test is the same as what you would get on another test.
3 of 30
inter-rater reliabilty
to avoid observer bias. two observers need to observe behaviour and correlate them to see if they are similar.
4 of 30
validity
this is seeing how accurate a piece of research is at measuring what it says its meauring. if there is lots of extraneous variables then the IV may be effected by it.
5 of 30
what is high internal validity
if there are high degrees of control and no extraneous variale it has high internal validity.
6 of 30
external validity
if the research has been done in a real life setting it has high external validty so it can be geneeralised
7 of 30
face validity
how good the test looks to be at what it is supposed to be testing
8 of 30
construct validty
where a test measures the behaviour it sets out to measure
9 of 30
concurrent validity
where a test give the same result as another study which claims to measure the same behaviour
10 of 30
criterion validity
how much one measure predicts the value of another measure
11 of 30
population validity
how accurately the test measurees behaiour that can be generalised to the wider population.
12 of 30
ecological validity
where the test can be conconsidered to replicate real life settings
13 of 30
thurstone scale
where the particpants must select which statements apply to them
14 of 30
likert scale
where the particpants are asked to rate how they feel about something
15 of 30
semantic differentail scale
where they are asked to rate items on opposing pairs
16 of 30
event sampling
the observer record every behaviour that ocurrs
17 of 30
time point sampling
where the observer records things at fixed intervals
18 of 30
time event sampling
where a fixed period of time is set forr the observation
19 of 30
counter balancing
is used when the same participants take part in each experimental condition. It involves the first half of the participants taking part in the first part of the experiment and the second taking part in the second and then switching to eliminate ord
20 of 30
one tailed hypothesis
predicts a change and says in which way the direction will go
21 of 30
two tailed hypothsis
will predict a change but wont say in which direction it will go in
22 of 30
faulsifiabilty
the capacity to prove something wrong and prove the hypothesis wrong
23 of 30
nomothetic
having general laws to stick to. eg; ethics
24 of 30
rules for parametric testing
normal distribution variances should be equal interval data
25 of 30
nominal data
shows catagories of behaviour and how oftern the occur. eg frequency table
26 of 30
ordinal data
shows each individual scores so they can be ranked
27 of 30
interval data
tells you differnces between individuals with measurement such as time.
28 of 30
research report
title abstract introduction method, which contains design, particpants, materials and procedure results discussion references apendix
29 of 30
harvard referencing
surname initial year source/ publisher volume page number
30 of 30

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

refers to the consistency of the results of a test across items within the test. do split half method to see if you get the same results in the second half of the test.

Back

internal reliablity and how its measured

Card 3

Front

refers to the extent to which the a test cores varies from one to another. for this do a test retest to see if the result you get on the first test is the same as what you would get on another test.

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

to avoid observer bias. two observers need to observe behaviour and correlate them to see if they are similar.

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

this is seeing how accurate a piece of research is at measuring what it says its meauring. if there is lots of extraneous variables then the IV may be effected by it.

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Research methods and techniques resources »