Reicher and Haslan

HideShow resource information
Background?
Revisiting previous study by Zimbardo which had to be terminated due to extreme behaviour. Zimbardo suggests guard's aggression was adoption of expected behaviour of role, R&H disagree and think it was more to do with instructions given by Zimbardo.
1 of 15
What year was the study conducted?
2006
2 of 15
Aim?
Reicher and Haslam attempted to create an institution to investigate the behaviour of groups that were unequal in terms of power, status and resources.
3 of 15
Sample?
Initial pool of 332 applicants reduced down to 27 men. Final sample of 15 chosen, then randomly divided into two groups - 5 guards & 10 prisoners. All Ps were normal, decent, well adjusted individuals. Recruited by advertisement in national press.
4 of 15
Design, method and data?
Independent measures design, experimental case study, both types of data.
5 of 15
Location?
Elstree Film Studios in North London, prison set up just for experiment.
6 of 15
IV & DV?
IV= Guard/Prisoner and interventions DV= Quantitative data collected from psychometric tests and cortisol levels plus comments.
7 of 15
Procedure (1)
Study monitored throughout by ethics committee and by individual psychologists. Study designed to create a hierarchical society in which people could live for up to 10 days. Prisoners were allocated lockable 3-person cells.
8 of 15
Procedure (2)
A lockable mesh gate separated Gs & Ps. Ps could be video and audio recorded everywhere. Daily psychometric testing was essential - included q's on social, organisational and clinical variables. Daily saliva swabs taken to measure cortisol levels.
9 of 15
Procedure (3)
Gs told it was up to them to make institution ran smoothly and prisoners performed their tasks; they were asked to draw up a set of punishments for rule violations, given no guidance, but told physical violence would not be tolerated.
10 of 15
Procedure (4)
Day 1- Guards taken in blacked out van to prison, then briefed on layout of prison and resources available - had keys to all doors in prison, surveillance, snacks and cigarettes and had ability to put Ps on bread&water diet.
11 of 15
Procedure (5)
9/10 participants arrived at same time with heads shaved, had clothes taken away and forced to shower. They had to wear uniforms.
12 of 15
What were the 3 planned interventions?
Permeability, legitimacy and cognitive alternatives.
13 of 15
Procedure (6)
Guards told to monitor Ps to see if anyone showed qualities of being guard as provision for promotion on day 3 - this was announced to Ps over loudspeaker which made remaining Ps think it was possible to move groups. Possibility was removed later.
14 of 15
Procedure (7)
On day 4, new prisoner was introduced. Picked for the role because of his background as an experienced trade union officer - R&H thought he would be enable Ps to envisage the achievement of a more equal set of social relations.
15 of 15

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What year was the study conducted?

Back

2006

Card 3

Front

Aim?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Sample?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Design, method and data?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Core studies resources »