Other questions in this quiz

2. Which case stated that, 'ABH is not limited to harm to the skin, flesh and bones of vicitm'?

  • R v Venna
  • DPP v Smith
  • R v Chan-fook
  • DPP v A

3. Which is the mens rea for ABH?

  • To recklessly cause ABH.
  • There is no need to intend the further harm which is caused as a result of an assault or battery.
  • Intention to cause ABH.
  • There is need to intend the further harm which is caused as a result of an assault or batter.

4. Which is the point of law from DPP v Smith?

  • Cutting hair can amount to ABH
  • Touching clothes can amount to ABH
  • Gave the the mens rea of ABH
  • Psychiatric harm can amount to ABH

5. Which two cases confirmed the mens rea of ABH?

  • R v Roberts and R v Savage
  • R v Lamb and R v Constanza
  • R v Roberts and R v Chan-fook
  • R v Chan-fook and R v DDP v Smith

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »