1. On 1 January, a supplier sent a letter to their wholesale customers offering to supply them with goods for the sum of £10,000. The supplier advised that this offer would be kept open until 31 January. A week after making the offer the supplier realised th
As the supplier promised to keep the offer open until 31 January they are obliged to sell the goods for £10,000.
As the customers sent their acceptance by post the supplier is obliged to sell the goods for £10,000.
As the supplier has effectively communicated that they have revoked the offer they are not obliged to sell the goods for £10,000.
As the customers have not communicated their acceptance the supplier is not obliged to sell the goods for £10,000.
As the supplier has not received the letter of acceptance they are not obliged to sell the goods for £10,000.
1 of 5
Other questions in this quiz
2. A woman is setting up a business in partnership with an ex-colleague. Both have significant expertise in the relevant business sector, are contributing the same amount of time and capital and are in agreement as to the fundamental aspects of the partnersh
The solicitor cannot act because both parties are competing for the same objective and as such it would not be reasonable to act for them both.
The solicitor can act because both parties are competing for the same objective and they have given their informed consent
The solicitor cannot act because there would be a conflict of interest or a significant risk of such a conflict between two current clients.
The solicitor can act because the parties have a substantially common interest in relation to the matter and they have both given their informed written consent.
The solicitor can act because there would be no conflict of interest or significant risk of such a conflict between two current clients.
3. A taxi driver carelessly failed to stop at a junction, which was marked with a give way sign. As a result, the taxi collided with an oncoming van. The van driver was driving at 5 mph above the speed limit at the time of the accident. The passenger in the
Yes, because the taxi driver breached the duty of care that he owed to his passenger.
No, because given the type of injury suffered by the passenger, he needs to sue both drivers in order to recover all of his damages.
Yes, because the taxi driver breached the duty of care that he owed to his passenger and that breach by the taxi driver made a material contribution to the passenger’s broken arm.
No, because the van driver broke the chain of causation by driving above the speed limit.
No, because the careless driving of the taxi driver was not the only cause of the passenger’s broken arm.
4. A solicitor acts for a claimant in personal injury proceedings claiming damages of £30,000 plus interest. The proceedings are defended and include an allegation of fifty percent contributory negligence. Both parties agree that the trial of the claim will
County Court Multi-track because of the financial value
Small claims track because of the financial value
High Court Multi-track because of the financial value
Fast track because of the financial value
Fast track because of the likely length of the trial
5. A client is setting up a new business with a friend. The business will sell luxury bespoke furniture. The client is a successful businessman who has four properties including a large country house where he lives with his family. He also owns four luxury s
A limited liability partnership (with both as members) or a private limited company.
A limited liability partnership (with the client as the sole designated member) or a private limited company.
A private limited company or a limited partnership (with the client as the limited partner).
A general partnership or a private limited company (with the client as the sole director but both the client and friend as shareholders).
Comments
No comments have yet been made