a term used to describe different moral codes of behavior; rules by which we make moral decisions (e.g. utilitarianism, Natural moral law, Kantian ethics, Virtue ethics)
1 of 7
Meta-ethics
The analysis of ethical language
2 of 7
Naturalistic fallacy
the claim that good cannot be defined (G.E. Moore:to claim that moral statements can be verified or falsified using evidence is to commit the naturalistic fallacy; based on David Hume's: derive an 'ought' from an 'is' is logically impossible
3 of 7
Analytic statement
statements which are true by definition
4 of 7
Synthetic statement
statements that may be true or false and can be tested are meaningful
5 of 7
Logical Postivism
the view that only things which can be tested are meaningful
6 of 7
empirical evidence
information that is gained via senses
7 of 7
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
The analysis of ethical language
Back
Meta-ethics
Card 3
Front
the claim that good cannot be defined (G.E. Moore:to claim that moral statements can be verified or falsified using evidence is to commit the naturalistic fallacy; based on David Hume's: derive an 'ought' from an 'is' is logically impossible
Back
Card 4
Front
statements which are true by definition
Back
Card 5
Front
statements that may be true or false and can be tested are meaningful
Comments
No comments have yet been made