Law - Unit 1 - Cases

?
  • Created by: bella
  • Created on: 22-04-15 19:54
T P S D O W C Q E M I M E D P P J E I D L
F I S H E R V B E L L Y G S W Y K O C F H
O J U L R V Y D J C U K L U U N T J D C M
C T W K V B C F S K D X G X G A D C L Q A
T A H H E I F P S L Q P P H W M J N D K L
O D I I C N P C M H N V C U C H H W P T N
O L T U C G F A I I V A R F Q U L Y E S O
B E E C L H R B T B G U W O V O U F P U M
R R L Q E A R H H H G G A R B I E P P B X
E V E H S M M L V Q U H W W E P K B E S W
W G Y E J J M G H M V A U H J G D G R V J
O E V R U U T K U T C N P K K N Q F V T Q
T O C R S S O T G E Y V U D N L L D H B A
V R H I T T T A H F M V G F J F Q S A S N
S G A N I I G Y E I V A J C F S Y S R O K
E E P G C C C V S T D U J F D S R M T W S
N B P T E E M F B H D G U H T Q J F V I N
O P E O S S I Q V H P H B Y O V W T K A F
J I L N A V Q F R U U A M L O C D Y Q O I
H R L B M G X P O B S N O M S J H O X K O
E G A C R F T V F U S U F D X H R W M T D

Clues

  • Act made it an offence to be in 'the vicinity of a prohibited place', d arrested inside place but Lord Parker held that in the vicinity of could mean 'being in or around prohibited place'. (5, 1, 6)
  • Case concerned taxable benefits under the finance act 1976. Court referred to the statements made in parliament by the finance minister to discover parliaments intention (6, 1, 4)
  • child trespasser injured in railway line, occupier held liable after HoL overruled its previous decision. (10)
  • D impersonated dead person, not guilty, as dead person "not entitled to vote" (8, 1, 8)
  • decided that racial harassment by employees was "in the course of employment" so the employer was liable as the acts intention was to make employers more proactive about dealing with racial abuse. (5, 1, 5, 4, 2)
  • Demonstrates bias towards the police (1, 1, 7, 8)
  • Flick knives for sale in shop window were invitaion to treat not "an offer for sale" which was banned by the act (6, 1, 4)
  • Legal advisor shouldn't have a role in Mags' discussions about their verdict (1, 1, 6, 8)
  • used dictionary to interpret the term molest and decide if it included D pestering his ex-wife by coming to her home and workplace. Dictionary defined molest as 'vex, trouble, annoy or put to inconvenience' and decided d's behaviour was molesting. (7, 1, 7)
  • words "solicting in the street" were held to include soliciting from a window of a house as aim of act was to prevent people to not be hassled in public places. (5, 1, 6)

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

LAW
See all Law resources »See all Judicial precedent resources »