Skip to content
Back to quiz
6. Which studies replicate Johnson & Newport (1989) study?
- Abrahamson (2012), White & Genessee (1996)
- DeKayser (2000), Birdsong & Malis (2001)
- Abrahamson (2012), Hakuta et al (2003)
- DeKayser (2000), Hakuta et al (2003)
7. What did Abrahamson (2012) study find?
- Strong negative correlation with morphosyntactic & phonetic test performance and AoA
- Strong positive correlation with morphosyntactic & phonetic test performance and AoA
- Strong negative correlation with morphosyntactic & lexical test performance and AoA
- Weak negative correlation with morphosyntactic & phonetic test performance and AoA
8. What did Abrahamson (2012) study find?
- only early learners of L2 (1-6yrs) showed signs of developing morph-syntactic & phonetic aspects simultaneously
- only late learners of L2 (16+ yrs) showed signs of developing morph-syntactic & phonetic aspects simultaneously
- only early learners of L2 (1-6yrs) showed signs of developing morph-syntactic & semantic aspects simultaneously
- only late learners of L2 (16+ yrs) showed signs of developing morph-syntactic & semantic aspects simultaneously
9. What participants did Birdsong & Malis (2001) use?
- L1/L2 pairing = French/English. 35 early arrivals. 65 late arrivals
- L1/L2 pairing = Spanish/English. 29 early arrivals. 32 late arrivals
- L1/L2 pairing = Spanish/English. 35 early arrivals. 65 late arrivals
- L1/L2 pairing = French/English. 29 early arrivals. 32 late arrivals
10. What participants did Abrahamson (2012) use?
- L1/L2 pairing = Spanish/Hungarian. 200 L1 Spanish of L2 Swedish. AoA ≤ 16 years = 101
- L1/L2 pairing = Spanish/Swedish. 200 L1 Spanish of L2 Swedish. AoA ≤ 16 years = 101
- L1/L2 pairing = Spanish/Swedish. 200 L1 Spanish of L2 Swedish. AoA ≤ 16 years = 150
- L1/L2 pairing = Spanish/Hungarian. 200 L1 Spanish of L2 Swedish. AoA ≤ 16 years = 150
11. What 3 groups did White & Genessee (1996) use?
- near-native English speakers, non-native, native control
- close-native English speakers, non-native, native control
- near-native Chinese speakers, non-native, native control
- far-native English speakers, non-native, native control
12. What participants did J&N use?
- 46 participants with L1 as Chinese or Japanese. Min 5 years exposure to language & min 3 years residency in US
- 46 participants with L1 as Chinese or Korean. Min 5 years exposure to language & min 3 years residency in US
- 51 participants with L1 as Chinese or Korean. Min 5 years exposure to language & min 3 years residency in US
- 51 participants with L1 as Chinese or Japanese. Min 5 years exposure to language & min 3 years residency in US
13. What did a number of studies find?
- individuals over 17 failed to attain native-like competence in L2
- individuals over 15 failed to attain native-like competence in L2
- individuals over 16 failed to attain native-like competence in L2
- individuals over 18 failed to attain native-like competence in L2
14. What is near-native?
- L2 in conversation identical to native speakers but can be identified by native speakers
- L2 in conversation identical to native speakers but can show in detailed analysis
- L2 in conversation not identical but can not be identified by native speakers
- L2 in conversation similar to native speakers and also shows in detailed analysis
15. Who found evidence of native-like performance in participants 16 and over?
- Birdsong & Malis (2001)
- Johnson & Newport (1989)
- Abrahamson (2012)
- DeKayser (2000)
- Hakuta et al (2003)
16. Who found a ceiling performance effect?
- Birdsong & Malis (2001)
- Johnson & Newport (1989)
- Abrahamson (2012)
- DeKayser (2000)
- Hakuta et al (2003)
17. What participants did DeKayser (2000) use?
- L1/L2 pairing = Hungarian/English. 15 AoA ≤ 16 years. 42 AoA ≥ 16 years
- L1/L2 pairing = Swedish/English. 15 AoA ≤ 16 years. 42 AoA ≥ 16 years
- L1/L2 pairing = Hungarian/English. 20 AoA ≤ 16 years. 31 AoA ≥ 16 years
- L1/L2 pairing = Swedish/English. 20 AoA ≤ 16 years. 31 AoA ≥ 16 years
18. What age effects did White & Genessee (1996) study find?
- early learners (≤ 7) = 75% achieved near-native performance. 2/3 adults reached near-native performance
- early learners (≤ 7) = 60% achieved near-native performance. 1/3 adults reached near-native performance
- early learners (≤ 7) = 75% achieved near-native performance. 1/3 adults reached near-native performance
- early learners (≤ 7) = 60% achieved near-native performance. 2/3 adults reached near-native performance
19. What participants did Hakuta et al (2003) use?
- 2 million + from 2000 census data. L1 = French or Chinese
- 2 million + from 2000 census data. L1 = Spanish or Chinese
- 2 million + from 1990 census data. L1 = Spanish or Chinese
- 2 million + from 1990 census data. L1 = French or Chinese
20. Which studies are against the critical period?
- Birdsong & Malis (2001), Hakuta et al (2003), White & Genessee (1996)
- Johnson & Newport (1989), Hakuta et al (2003), White & Genessee (1996)
- Birdsong & Malis (2001), Hakuta et al (2003), Abrahamson (2012)
- Johnson & Newport (1989), Dekayser (2000), Birdsong & Malis (2001)