Skip to content
Get Revising
Search:
Keyword:
Go
Subject
Resource type:
Resource type (all)
Flashcards
Revision cards
Revision notes
Quizzes
Mindmaps
Crosswords
Organise your thinking
Quizsearches
Shared resources
Join
Join Get Revising
Start learning now
Already a member?
Please sign in
Email address
Password
Forgotten your password?
Remember my details
Log in
Create
GCSE
A Level & IB
University
Study planner
Past papers
For teachers
More cards in this set
Card 36
Front
In Walter et al's article Stephan Cote found that ________ predicts who will lead a team (When IQ + personality is taken into account)
Back
Card 37
Front
Who criticises EI and argued that IQ determines success in the workplace and society? He argues that their is evidence to support this
Back
Card 38
Front
Antonakis et al argues that there is only one ..?
Back
Card 39
Front
Antonakis et al argues that EI findings are weak because the measuring ______ is based on individual judgement -> poor validity and reliability
Back
Card 40
Front
Antonakis et al argues that EI findings are weak because they can be _____ by the Big 5 personality model and IQ
Back
Card 41
Front
Antonakis et al argues that no findings ________ that high EI leads to high leadership performance
Back
Card 42
Front
Antonakis et al even goes as far as to argue that high EI is a _________ for leadership -> a bit contradictory saying it doesn't exist a
Back
Card 43
Front
Who argues that EI is poorly defined, based on unreasobable claims and isn't worth further research
Back
Card 44
Front
Conte and Murphy support Antonakis et al by arguing that the EI testing tool is poorly designed and lacks _____
Back
Card 45
Front
Who argues that EI is impossible to measure?
Back
View more cards
