ELS: Juries
- Created by: em.101
- Created on: 27-10-17 21:40
| J | Q | S | S | W | S | X | H | Y | O | U | N | G | S | C | A | S | E | U | H | V |
| T | E | W | O | D | E | F | I | N | E | J | U | R | Y | E | Q | U | I | T | Y | K |
| T | L | Q | A | G | X | X | D | R | T | B | F | H | H | N | V | M | Q | L | K | Q |
| D | E | E | O | U | I | J | A | B | O | A | R | D | C | A | S | E | S | V | B | W |
| W | X | X | X | M | S | L | U | Q | K | L | T | W | U | G | Y | B | K | D | U | B |
| J | W | H | O | C | E | U | V | H | T | M | S | E | O | P | R | I | E | I | F | N |
| K | J | C | W | D | X | X | J | T | I | L | B | Y | J | E | S | J | D | X | D | W |
| G | F | L | W | A | R | D | V | J | A | M | E | S | K | P | F | T | R | R | T | G |
| L | J | A | K | R | B | T | I | K | S | I | G | S | M | R | E | M | X | X | I | G |
| G | I | J | U | R | I | E | S | I | N | C | I | V | I | L | C | A | S | E | S | G |
| J | P | O | N | T | I | N | G | K | R | O | N | L | I | D | S | P | B | Q | C | D |
| P | Q | Q | F | G | O | W | N | P | P | A | G | L | G | E | X | C | T | V | X | H |
| D | W | C | H | A | L | L | E | N | G | E | F | O | R | C | A | U | S | E | K | R |
| B | C | H | A | L | L | E | N | G | E | T | O | T | H | E | A | R | R | A | Y | G |
| T | R | T | R | V | T | A | Y | L | O | R | Y | C | P | S | H | H | U | O | W | R |
| R | E | A | S | O | N | S | T | O | B | E | E | X | C | U | S | E | D | A | C | V |
| V | G | U | J | H | F | W | C | W | L | W | Y | B | X | N | E | Q | W | I | C | D |
| D | F | P | Y | J | F | M | B | G | D | M | M | L | J | F | W | H | Q | F | Q | D |
| R | O | J | A | O | B | V | E | E | R | N | E | S | X | J | V | S | U | D | E | M |
| Q | H | P | X | H | U | H | A | F | E | C | S | B | F | E | L | O | E | W | D | E |
| O | Y | C | X | R | M | Y | K | O | Y | T | Y | H | C | I | G | W | F | W | S | L |
Clues
- "Jury Equity" cases (7, 7)
- (1) may be refused if judge thinks case is TOO COMPLEX (2) PI cases in exceptional circumstances (3) decide guilt, assess damages (6, 2, 5, 5, 0)
- by pros/ defence // connection or incapacity (9, 3, 5)
- by pros/ defence // way jury selected (9, 2, 3, 5)
- Can apply own idea of fairness, essentially ignoring the law (6, 4, 6)
- can't tell if reasoned decision has been met // needed retrial (6, 4)
- difficult to appeal // needed retrial (5, 5, 4)
- media influence in jury case (1, 1, 6)
- PI case in HIGH COURT // no juries used in such a case since then (4, 1, 5)
- service deferred for "good reason", application to JCSB (7, 2, 2, 7)
Comments
No comments have yet been made