do cosmological arguments simply jump to the conclusion of a transcendant creator without sufficient explanation

?
what was humes biggest criticism against the teleological and cosmological argment
the leap which is too large to be jstified - naturalistic fallacy
1 of 6
what is his alternative explanations other than naturalistic fallacy
other possibilities , chance , coud be created by a stupid god who copied or trialed and errored our world, a commitee of gods/angelsdemons
2 of 6
what was he trying to demonstrate with his alternative explanations
that we shouldnt be closed minded and immediately believe it is god. there are many more hypothesis,
3 of 6
what is aquinas' counter argument
there mst be a transcendant god
4 of 6
why does he support this
there must be an uncaused and umoved figure which has a speacial necessary existence.
5 of 6
why is this idea a counter
because this idea is the most plausible explaation for the movement, the reason for our usniverse
6 of 6

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

what is his alternative explanations other than naturalistic fallacy

Back

other possibilities , chance , coud be created by a stupid god who copied or trialed and errored our world, a commitee of gods/angelsdemons

Card 3

Front

what was he trying to demonstrate with his alternative explanations

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

what is aquinas' counter argument

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

why does he support this

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Chemistry resources:

See all Chemistry resources »See all fghjk resources »