Cosmological argument

1. What are aquinas’ cosmological arguments?

Motion, cause and contingency. Inductive arguments which use reductio ad absurdum to disprove the idea of an infinite regress.
Order, cause and contingency. Inductive arguments which use reductio ad absurdum to disprove the idea of an infinite regress.
Motion, effect and contingency. Inductive arguments which use reductio ad absurdum to disprove the idea of an infinite regress.
Motion, cause and design. Inductive arguments which use reductio ad absurdum to disprove the idea of an infinite regress.

1 of 20

In nature, everything can exist or not exist. Given infinite time, everything will eventually not exist. If there was once something, nothing could come from it.
In nature, everything can exist or not exist. Given infinite time, everything will eventually not exist. If there was once nothing, nothing could come from it.
In nature, everything can exist or not exist. Given infinite time, everything will eventually not exist. If there was once nothing, something could come from it.
In nature, everything can exist or not exist. Given infinite time, everything will eventually exist. If there was once nothing, something could come from it.

Our knowledge of the world is limited to space and time, we can’t speculate on what exists outside of it. Necessary being is a fallacy as the premise ‘go exists’ is not a self evident proposition.
Our knowledge of the world is limited to space and time, we can’t speculate on what exists outside of it. Necessary being is a fallacy as the premise ‘go exists’ is a self evident proposition.
Our knowledge of the world is limited to space and time, we can speculate on what exists outside of it. Necessary being is a fallacy as the premise ‘god exists’ is not a self evident proposition.

Either the universe had an ultimate cause, or no ultimate cause. If it had one, the chain of cause and effect had no beginning. If the chain of cause and effect had no beginning, there would be no chain! Ergo, there is an ultimate cause.
Either the universe had an ultimate cause, or no ultimate cause. If it didn’t have one, the chain of cause and effect had no beginning. If the chain of cause and effect had a beginning, there would be a chain! Ergo, there is an ultimate cause.
Either the universe had an ultimate cause, or no ultimate cause. If it didn’t have one, the chain of cause and effect had no beginning. If the chain of cause and effect had no beginning, there would be no chain! Ergo, there is an ultimate cause.
Either the universe had an ultimate cause, or no ultimate cause. If it didn’t have one, the chain of cause and effect had no beginning. If the chain of cause and effect had no beginning, there would be a chain! Ergo, there is an ultimate cause.

We have experience of the universe being made, but can’t speak of it. Even if the universe did begin, nothing proves god caused it. Sufficient reason is flawed and those who look for it in the universe are looking for something that does exist.
. We have no experience of the universe being made, so can’t speak of it. Even if the universe did begin, nothing proves god caused it. Sufficient reason is flawed and those who look for it in the universe are looking for something that does exist.
We have no experience of the universe being made, so can’t speak of it. Even if the universe did begin, nothing proves god caused it. Sufficient reason is flawed and those who look for it in the universe are looking for something that doesn’t exist.
We have experience of the universe being made, so can speak of it. Even if the universe did begin, nothing proves god caused it. Sufficient reason is flawed and those who look for it in the universe are looking for something that doesn’t exist.