Cases for Muder 0.0 / 5 ? LawCriminal lawFatal offencesA2/A-levelAQA Created by: Katie BeaumontCreated on: 21-04-17 20:49 Who defined the definition for muder? Sir Edward Coke 1 of 14 What is the names of the cases that confirms that factual causation is tested using the 'but for' test? Pagett/White 2 of 14 What happened in the case of Pagett? D used his pregnant girlfriend as a human shield when being fired at 3 of 14 What happened in the case of White? D poisoned his mother's tea intending to kill her but she died of a heart attack before she drunk it. 4 of 14 Wha does the cases of Smith and Cheshire confirm? They confirm that d's actions must be a signficiant & operative cause of v's death, which is the legal causation 5 of 14 Novus actus interveniens are intervening acts, what are the names of the 2 cases that demonstrate actions of a 3rd party? Jordan/Cheshire 6 of 14 What does the cases of Roberts and Williams confirm? They confirm that escapism is an intervening act, that could break the chain of causation 7 of 14 What does the case of Blaue confirm? It confirms that, in the thin skull rule, d must take v as they find them 8 of 14 What does the case of Dhaliwal do? It did not break the chain of causation, as it couldn't be prove that d's actions caused v's suicide 9 of 14 What is the name of the case where, for the purposes of murder, a foetus must be born alive for it to be a 'human being'? AG Ref 3 of 1994 10 of 14 What happened in the case of AG Ref 3 of 1994? D stabbed a pregnant woman which caused premature birth of a 22 week old baby, who died 4 months later- d was not guilty 11 of 14 What are the 3 cases where the jury must find that the result was objectively virtually certain & d was aware of this? Nedrick/Woolin/Matthews & Alleyne 12 of 14 What does the case of Saunders confirm? It confirms that GBH means serious harm. 13 of 14 What case confirms that GBH is really serious harm? DPP v Smith 14 of 14
Comments
No comments have yet been made