This is the principle that the defendant can be guilty if he intended to commit a cimilar crime but against a different victim. An example is aiming a blow at one person with the necessary mens rea for assault causing ABH, but actually hitting another person which occurred in Latimer (1886).
However, where the mens rea if for a completely different type of offence tn the defendant may not be guilty. This was stated in Pembliton (1874), where the defendant threw a stone, intending to hit people with whom he had been fighting. The stone ht and broke a window. The intention to hit people could not be transferred to the window.
The doctrine of transferred malice was confirmed obiter dicta by the House of Lords in the case of Attorney-General's Reference (No 3 of 1994) (1997).
In some cases the defendant might not have a specific victim in mind: for example who plants a bomb in a pub, intending to kill or injure anyone who happens to be there. In this case the mens rea is held to apply to the actual victim.
Comments
No comments have yet been made