Case Law
0.0 / 5
- Created by: Hayley Turpin
- Created on: 07-10-19 12:37
Condition
Poussard v Spears Pond 1876; Behn v Burness 1862
1 of 38
Warranty
Bettiny v Gye 1896
2 of 38
Innominate Terms
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd 1962
3 of 38
Formation of a contract (four elements)
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1892
4 of 38
Unilateral Contract
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1892
5 of 38
Doctrine of Privity Contract
Dunlop v Selfridges 1915; Tweddle v Atkinson 1831
6 of 38
Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Business Agreements
Edmonds v Lawson 2000
7 of 38
Honour Clauses
Rose & Frank v Crompton 1923
8 of 38
Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Social and Domestic Agreements
Jones v Padavatton 1968
9 of 38
Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Social and Domestic Agreements - Domestic Situation
Merritt v Merritt 1970
10 of 38
Rebuttable Presumption (ITCLR) - Social and Domestic Agreements - Social Situation
Simpkins v Pays 1955
11 of 38
Offer: Certain Terms
Scammel & Nephew Ltd v Ouston 1994
12 of 38
Offer: Must be communicated
Taylor v Laird 1856
13 of 38
ITT
Harris v Nickerson 1873 (Auction); Payne v Cave 1789
14 of 38
Mere Statement of Price
Clifton v Palumbo 1944 'I am prepared'; Gibson v Manchester CC 1979 'maybe prepared'
15 of 38
Terms of Contract - Mere Puffs
Mead v Babbington 2007
16 of 38
Terms of Contract - Importance attached to the statement
Bannerman v White 1861
17 of 38
Terms of Contract - whether statement put into writing
Birch v Paramount Estates Ltd 1956
18 of 38
Terms of Contract -Timing of Statement
Routledge v McKay 1954
19 of 38
Terms of Contract -whether the parties have specialist skills and knowledge
Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams 1957 compared to **** Bentley Production Ltd v Harold Smith (motors) Ltd 1965
20 of 38
Case Law
Also known as Legal Authority
21 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - By Signature
L'Strange v F Graucob Ltd 1934
22 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Exception to rule
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dying Co 1951
23 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Notice
Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel 1949
24 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Consistent course of dealings
J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw 1956 compared to Hollier v Rambler Motors 1972
25 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Understanding of the parties
British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire 1975
26 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Reasonable notice
Parker v South Eastern Railway Co 1877; L'Strange v F Graucob 1934
27 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Timing of notice
Olly v Marlborough Hotel 1949; Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking 1971
28 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Type of document
Chappleton v Barry Urban District Council 1940
29 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Type of Clause (redhand rule)
J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw 1956 (consistent) compared to Hollier v Rambler Motors 1972 (not consistent)
30 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Type of Clause (redhand rule)
Inter Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd 1998 (distinguished from) Photo Library Group Ltd v Burda Senator Vertag GMBH 2008
31 of 38
Incorporation of Terms - Incorporation through a common understanding of the parties
British Crane Hire Corp Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire 1975
32 of 38
Classification of Terms - Terms implied by Statute
Acts of Parliament
33 of 38
Classification of Terms - Original (older) Acts
The Sale of Goods Act 1979 - Business to Business; The Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 - Business to Business Relationships
34 of 38
Classification of Terms - The New Act
Classification of Terms - The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - Business to Consumer Relathionships
35 of 38
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - CRA2015:S9 Satisfactory Quality
Grant v Australian Knitting Mill
36 of 38
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - CRA2015:S10 Fit for Purpose
Priest v Last 1903
37 of 38
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 - CRA2015:S11 (strict) Modern Interpretation
Old case - Moore v Landauer 1921
38 of 38
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Bettiny v Gye 1896
Back
Warranty
Card 3
Front
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd 1962
Back
Card 4
Front
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1892
Back
Card 5
Front
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1892
Back
Related discussions on The Student Room
- fisher v bell »
- In search of law books for uni »
- Regarding a level law »
- What is the most boring law module? »
- Is commercial law more similar to contract or trusts? »
- OCR A Level Law Paper 3 »
- Contract Law »
- When to apply for ULaw SQE/ BPP? »
- Hidden legal training contracts? »
- A Level Law Study Group 2022-2023 »
Similar Revision Skills resources:
1.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
2.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
1.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
1.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
0.0 / 5
2.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
Comments
No comments have yet been made