Psychology attachment 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyAttachmentASAQA Created by: BethgarrodCreated on: 20-05-17 21:43 Evaluate Schaffers stages of attachment 1. can't measure multiple attachments. 2. Ijzendoorn studied conflicting evidence. 3. hard to study asocial stage 1 of 13 Evaluate Schaffer and Emerson study 1. Good external validity. 2. good longitudinal study. 3. limited sample characteristics 2 of 13 Evaluate Romanian orphan studies 1. real-life application. 2. good internal validity. 3. not typical 3 of 13 Evaluate maternal deprivation 1. Counter evidence by Lewis. 2. Bias from Bowlby. 3. Confusion between privation and deprivation 4 of 13 Evaluate caregiver-infant interactions 1. Controlled observations. 2. Hard to observe infants. 3. No purpose of synchrony 5 of 13 Evaluating attachment figures 1.Inconsistent father findings. 2. Conflicting evidence from MacCcallum and Golombok. 3. stereotypical gender roles 6 of 13 Evaluating Loren'z research 1. can't generalise. 2. Conflicting evidence from Guiton et al 7 of 13 Evaluating Harlow's research 1. Practical value. 2. Ethical issues. 3. Has theoretical value 8 of 13 Evaluating the learning theory 1. Conflicting evidence from Schaffer and Emerson study. 2. Ignores other factors of forming attachments. 3. animal studies contradict 9 of 13 Evaluating strange situation 1. Good reliability. 2. culture-bound. 3. support for validity by Kokkinos 10 of 13 Evaluating cultural variations in attachment 1. large sample. 2. bias assessment. 3. Bowlby's theory contradicts 11 of 13 Evaluating Bowlby's monotropic theory 1. Bailey et al support for internal working model. .2 Brazleton et al support for social releasers. 3. socially sensitive idea 12 of 13 Evaluating the influence of early attachment on later relationships 1. Social desirability bias. 2. correlation isn't causation. 3. Conflicting evidence from Zimmerman 13 of 13
Comments
No comments have yet been made