A8 Right to respect for private & family life

?
E B A E R G Q L A T C E I G H W D Y L G V
N E S W V R J B X P H W U B L L Y C O W E
I R Q L U U P B Y T R X X X O I E A P C I
E R M N K N D G R Y I W C C S B K Y E F W
M E A W U E F T M M S T V S F E R S Z H O
I H R D V R C O M A T H Q K A R U Q O B G
E A C T N V R H Q U I R F K D T T M S V J
T B K M A N F H F E N F U S E Y V P T Y X
Z V X G M E I C P G E T F M Y A R W R L G
V N V X R T P P D J G H M Y E N A K A H D
G E B N A H N P K V O Y J R V D V L V K F
E T E H H E A S N S O A L M A O I Y S Q J
R H L G T R E B W O D F T I V T D N P O G
M E G U T L O X X H W V C L R H K U A P T
A R I L I A Y G P V I N K P U E A M I B X
N L U P W N U G X J N F H H S R T X N O I
Y A M O E D R T W R V D Y U S S B A O I X
Y N A A H S P C P H U W M K I V T C Q T X
T D C A D L S O X Q K T D K A U E M U K A
Y S K G T Y M R S Q W I F R J K B J F U S
E O Y N K W E G W C K X O D L O F U S A Y

Clues

  • attack PKK on security post, killings felt loals supported so burnt down houses. Destruction gravely violates interference of home. (7, 1, 6)
  • B moroccan married Dutch right to reside & work. Divorce. amicable & £ given. immig deport B St - B & family close still family life. Dutch justify deportation 8(2) ec well being non-nat in small area. not necessary or proportionate for aim. Breach. (8, 1, 11)
  • Fax sent PO to judge accusing PM of abuse. Proceedings began without him. Warrant office for 1 hrs looked at client docs etc. Violtion A 8, 13, A1 p1. Breach private life, no definition kept wide & flexible. Too restrictive to keep in personal life. (8, 1, 7)
  • Iron manuf pollution Gov made zone around it so no housing but state built homes there. Breach due to level of pollution and complaints. (8, 1, 6)
  • Leather manuf toxic chemicals. 12m from house claim unbearable. Sp unsucessful, rehoused 2yrs. St - interferance, 8(2) ec important for locals legit. Breach as no fair balance interests & economy. (5, 5, 1, 5)
  • NGO case, L info leaked. Br gov intercept all calls Br-Ireland. L endangered st litigation in collaberation w/ Ir on HR. V likely listened to. St - legal syst didnt meet 8(2) insufficient safeguards & too wide. emails also protected. (7, 3, 6, 1, 2)
  • No formal recognition of new identity. States must give full legal recognition of new identity. Wide margin removed as EU consensus. (EU cautious let states change 1st) (9, 7, 1, 2)
  • Senior in nat council of civil liberties. MI5 told sec service secret files on them from NGO work.St - indiv files breach A8. Justified? Nat sec, not in accordance w/ law. No MI5 no leg - breach (6, 6, 1, 2)
  • Single parent family. B not recognise it St - it is a family (6, 1, 7)
  • Turkish 12yo & mum join dad. U not sought Dutch citizenship. U crim offences (had kid). Convicted MS 7yr prison. Deportation as danger & banned 10yrs. St GC- weigh up seriousness crime, closeness rel, children. justified exclusion on protection, (4, 1, 11)

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all ECHR resources »