CASES FROM SECTION 1

Osman v DPP- Police case, sued police for unlawful stop and search

Rumford Jury

Abse v Smith- Solicitor higher rights of audience

Case of Eccles v R- Clerk/ legal advisor cannot assist in legal decision making 

Bushells Case- independence of Jury 

Bibby v Chief Constable of Essex- Summarises the conditions that must apply for this common law power of arrest to be used 

Griffiths v Dawson

Chief Constable of Greater Manchest Police v McConnell 

Highbury Corner Magistrates v Michaels 

PACE

A- STOP AND SEARCH

B- SEARCH PREMISES AND SEIZE PROPERTY

C- DETENTION AND QUESTIONING

D- IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE

E- TAPE RECORDING

F- VISUAL RECORDING

G- ARREST

H- SUSPECTS DETAINED UNDER THE TERRORISM ACT

CASE OF ECCLES- CLERK CANNOT TAKE PART IN DECISION MAKING

BUSHELLS CASE- INDEPDENCE OF JURY

ROMFORD JURY- ALL JURORS CAME FROM ROMFORD

R V FRASER- ETHNIC DIVERSITY IN JURY, ALL JURORS WERE WHITE DEFENDANT WAS BLACK

ABSE V SMITH- SOLICITOR HRA

OSMAN V DPP- UNLAWFUL STOP AND SEARCH

MCCONNELLS V CHIEF CONSTABLE OF GREATER MANCHESTER- ARREST FOR BREACH OF THE POLICE APPLIES EVEN IF OFFENDER IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

HIGHBURY CORNER MAGISTRATES 

R V FORD- RANDOM SELECTION COULD NOT BE CHALLENGED AS IT WAS RANDOM AND SHOWED RANDOMNESS

BIBBY V CHIEF CONSTABLE OF ESSEX POLICE- COA SUMMARISED CONDITIONS FOR ARREST TO BE LAWFUL

R V FORD- RANDOM SELECTION CANNOT BE CHALLENGED BECAUSE ITS RANDOM

R V FRASER- JURY DIVERSITY

ROMFORD JURY- ALL JURORS LIVED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY

CASE OF ECCLES- CLERK CANNOT PARTAKE IN DECISION MAKING

BUSHELLS CASE- INDEPENDENCE OF JURY 

MCCONNELLS V CHIEF OF POLICE FOR GREATER MANCHESTER- DISTURBANCE OF PEACE EVEN APPLIES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

BIBBY V CHIEF CONSTABLE OF ESSEX POLICE- OUTLINES REQUIREMENTS FO COMMON ARREST TO BE USED

OSMAN V DPP- LAWFUL STOP AND SEARCH

ABSE V SMITH- SOLICITOR HRA 

HIGHBURY CORNER MAGISTRATES-

R V MASON- POLICE CHECKS AND VETTING

ABC TRIAL- BOUGHT TO LIGHT VETTING 

R V FORD- RANDOM SELECTION CANNOT BE GONE AGAINST

R V MASON- POLICE CHECKS AND VETTING

ROMFORD JURY- ALL JURORS LIVED SUPER CLOSE

HIGHBURY CORNER MAGISTRATES- LITERALLY THE SAME CASE AS OSMAN V DPP

ABSE V SMITH- SOLICITOR HRA

ECCLES- LEGAL CLERK CANT GET INVOLVED

BUSHELLS- JURY INDEPENDENCE 

OSMAN V DPP- LAWFUL STOP AND SEARCH

MCCONNELS V CHIEF CONSTABLE OF GREATER MANCHESTER- PRIVATE PROPERTY DISTURBANCE OF THE POLICE

BIBBY V CHIEF CONSTABLE OF ESSEX POLICE- GROUNDS FOR ARREST, IF OFFENDER POSES A THREAT ETC... 

PONTINGS CASE- JURY EQUITY

ABC TRIAL- BRINGS LIGHT TO JURY VETTING

12

1) R V FORD- JURY…