Zimbardo's Stanford Prison experiment

HideShow resource information

Social Roles

  • The 'parts' people play as members of various social groups. These are accompanied by expectations we and others have of what is appropriate behaviour in each role.
  • E.g. being a parent would show being caring, a student would be obedient.
1 of 8

Procedure

  • Advertised for students and selected student who were deemed 'emotionally stable'
  • Study would last for two weeks and participants were paid $15 a day
  • Set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University psychology department.
  • Students were randomly assigned the roles of guards or prisoners
  • Prisoners were arrested in their homes to heighten realism of the study, strip searched, given a uniform and prison numers.
  • Prisoners locked in rooms for 23 hours a day, had 16 rules to follow, routines were heavily regulated.
  • Prison guards: own uniform including wooden club, keys, handcuffs and sunglasses, went home after shifts. Were told they had complete control over the prisoners. 
2 of 8

Findings

  • Stopped after 6 days instead of 14
  • Threat to psychological and physical health of prisoners
  • Prisoners shouted swore at the guards, ripped their uniforms. 
  • Guards harrassed prisoners, did frequent headcounts etc.
  • Two prisoners suffered nervous breakdown
  • One suffered a nervous rash
  • One prisoner went on hunger strike - punished by putting him in 'the hole'.
  • Was shunned by other prisoners 
  • Prisoners began to do as they were told - although it caused them distress. 
  • Guards became brutal and aggressive. 
3 of 8

Conclusions

  • Conformed to social roles. 
  • Deindividualisation - lose sense of identity. Conformed to the norms of the group.
4 of 8

Strengths

Strengths

  • Had control over variables. 
  • E.g. choosing emotionally stable participants and randomly assigning roles - rules out personality differences 
  • Control over variables = increases internal validity - confident in drawing conclusions.
  • Collected data efficiently
5 of 8

Weaknesses

Weaknesses

  • Lack of realism - Banuazizi and Mohavedi (1975) argued participants were play acting not conforming. 
  • Performances based on stereotypes
  • Lacks ecological validity - isn't completely realistic
  • Unrepresentative - 24 healthy male, middle class, white, college students. 
  • Fromm (1973) - Zimbardo exaggerated findings, only 1/3 of guards performed in a brutal manner.  
  • Rest tried to help the prisoners, sympathised. 
  • beahviour of guards show they're able to exercise right and wrong choices despite situational pressures to conform
6 of 8

Ethical issues

  • Decpetion - Being arrested unexpectedly at home
  • Experiment was abandoned after 6 days
  • Extensive group and individual debriefings were held
  • Benefits gained about understanding human behaviour
7 of 8

Evaluation Extra

  • Lack of research support:
  • Steve Reicher and Alex Haslam's (2006) replicated the study, found prisoners took control of the prison, guards were subjected to harrassment. 
  • Social Identity Theory (Tajfel 1981) - guards failed to develop a shared society identity as a cohesive group, the prisoners did. 
  • Prisoners actively identified themselves as members of a social group. 
8 of 8

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Conformity resources »