World Cities
- Created by: azzax
- Created on: 28-10-15 18:20
Key Terms
Mega City - Metrapolitan area with a total population of over 10 million
World City - City that has global influennce due to its financial status and commercial power
Million City - A city with over a million inhabitants
Urbanisation - Increase in the proportion of people living in urban areas compared to rural areas
Suburbanisation - Outward growth of cities causing them to engulf surrounding countryside
Counter-urbanisation - Increase in the number of people living in accessible rural areas
Urban Decline - Deteroration of the inner city due to lack of invesment and maintanance
Urban Regeneration - Invesments in order to revive the inner city by improving and rebuilding
Re-Urbanisation - Movement of people into the inner city or even city centre environments. Regeneration schemes are likely to cause this (effect of regeneration)
Core-Periphery Theory
Core-periphery theory: explains the link between urbanisation and development
Core economic activities: high tech, high pay, requiring high capital invesments
Periphery economic activities - low tech, low pay, requiring low capital invesments
Global core: Europe, North America, Japan (starting to develop in China and India)
Periphery regions: provide raw mateials, cheap labour means the raw materials are cheap
Muliplier effect: Invesment --> Growth of industry --> Need work force --> People move there --> Need services --> Workers needed to provide them --> Need food --> Shops open = more services --> Demand for more workers --> Growth continues, settlements and economy expands
Urbanisation - Causes
Rural overpopulation and desertification - birth rate is higher than death rates = large families so there is less land per person to farm on and land is cultivated more in order to provide the food = land loses fertility and becomes desertified
Rural - urban migration - aspects of urban life seem more appealing so people move
Employment oppertunities - more and variety of jobs avalibale in cities
Changes in farming practices - availability of machinery = less people needed to owrk the land so those who do not work the land move to cities in search for work
Causes of urban growth can be divided into 2:
- Rural - urban migration
- Natural population growth: young poeple of child bearing age usually migrate to cities, increasing the birth rate in cities
Urbanisation - Concequences
Low quality of life - services can't keep up with the growing population so migrants build their own homes, lacking basic neccessities. An increase in infant mortality rate can be seen
Waste management - Disposal of waste may not be efficient is cities leading to the city being litered
Air pollution - large city population = more transport = air pollution and city wide smog
Traffic congestion - large city population = more vehicles on the road. Roads may be inadequete leading to congestion. Inefficient ways of controlling traffic can lead to 'all day rush hours'
Urbanisation - Push factors
Negative features of living in a rural place
Overpopulation - Results in overfarming producing low yields, not enough services
Agricultural problems - desertification, sub-division of land, debt on loans to help pay for new machinery
Wars and conflicts - no protection so people leave to safer places
Poor services - high illiteracy and death rates due to lack of education, health care and sanitation
Natural disasters - destroys livlihoods so people move to areas less prone to them
Lack of food - crops are often sold for export or to feed urban population so there isn't enough in rural areas = move to the city where the is more food. Bad harvests also contribute to this
Urbanisation - Pull factors
Positive features of living in urban places
Employment - wider range of jobs with higher wages than in rural places
Informal employment - easy work requiring little skills, no qualifications: anybody can do them (widely available in cities, attractive in LEDCs)
Percieved better quality of life - more jobs, better housing, more services: people believe life will be better
Better quality services - better healthcare = lower death rate, better education = increases literacy rates so people have access to better jobs
Urbanisation - Dharavi
Shanty town situated north of central Mumbai: 1 million live there illegally
Has homes: self built but sold + many have electricity, workshops, stalls, clinics and schools
Houses are improved by inhabitants when they can: Consolidation
Lack of basics: 1 toilet for 1,500 people, open drains, inadequete water supply, homes = 3x2 big
'Vision Mumbai' - transform the city into a 'wrold class' city by 2015
Redevelop Dharavi - better housing (3x bigger), healthcare, education and infastructure
Dharavi's value of land - on higher gorund: doesn't flood = good place to extend the Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC): business destrict
What people get: if living before 1995 with documents: free housing, bussinesses 225sqft of land
Who lose out: those without documents, polluting bussinesses eg leather tanning
Suburbanisation - LA (Cause of urbanisation)
Location - West Coast of USA, California
Population - 24 million: mega city/magalopolis
Improved transport - transcontinental railway from east to west finished in 1876: half a million arrived in 40 years
Employment oppetunities - Early C20: discovery of oil, manufacturing indsutry (eg Ford), aircraft industry, tourism
'Hollywood' image - 1920s-30s: development in film industry led to glam image
Increased affluence - people had more money and the warm cllimate, 'romantic flower power' led to poeple migrating to LA
Suburbanisation - LA (Cause of suburbanisation)
Transport - freeways, 1960s: petrol was $1 per gallon so people could live far and travel via car: growth of LA as fas as the San Bernandino mountains - 2 hrs from central LA
Space and planning laws - lots of cheap land around LA that people could purchase and build on as lack of planning restrictions
Crime and safety - semi derelict inner city was crime ridden and poor: people didn't want to bring up children in such an environment
Changing industry - decline in manufacturing (overseas competition), increase in service industry
Suburbanisation - LA (Concequences)
Social:
Loss of land & commuter stress - stress from travelling to work less time with family, 100 district towns in the Greater LA Metrapolitan area
Donut & edge city - new industry, services in edge cities: work available at people's doorstep
Air pollution - smog is hazardous and can cause asthma
Social/racial segregation - inner city has high crime rate, mainly Hespanic live there
Economic:
Donut & edge city - bussinesses migrate to suburbs, light manufacturing need more space
Environmental:
Air pollution - Dense cold air sinks over LA with layer of warm air under it (inversion layer). It traps pollutants from traffic creating a city wide smog (10 million car owners)
Suburbanisation - LA (PLAN)
PLAN's proposal for a sustainable city:
- Increase in urban parks, clean up contaminated brownfield sites
- Promote clean fuel vehicles, green energy
- Improve public transport: 'clean' buses, rapid bus lines
- Create a universal low fare card: allows easy transfer between bus and train
- Promote smart land use: people can drive less, live nearer to where they work, shop study, play
New Towns
New Town - Planned towns built in C20: solution to conceequences of urbanisation & suburbanisation:
Urbanisation - led to overcrowding in major conurbations in early C20
Suburbanisation - led to sprawl and increased commuting
First Generation New Towns - Aim: Housing overspill from London Characteristics: 30,000 - 50,000 population, self-contained settlements, mixed social class neighbourhoods Example: Stevenage
Expanded Towns - Aim: Expand existing towns to develop remoter rural areas Charactersitics: large surburban developments in small towns, industrial development allowed Example: Swindon
Second Generation New Towns and New Cities - Aim: Cities with multiplier effect Characteristics: 100,000 - 250,000 population, private developments, large supermarkets Example: Telford
Eco-Towns
Eco-Towns - towns that are planned to be economically, socially, envornmentally sustainable
An eco-town has standards it has to meet:
Homes - 30% should be affordable
Employment - 1 job per household should be in walking distance of home
Energy - Has to be carbon neutral: uses no more energy than produced
Services - Essential services should be in walking distance of home
Space - 40% should be green space
Transport - less than half of all journeys should be by car
Waste - Should have above average recycling rates
Government - Everyone should have a say in how the town is ran
Eco-Towns - North West Bicester
North West Bicester Exemplar Phase - 1st eco-town in the UK is currently being built
It will have:
- 3,500 energy effiecient homes
- 34m squared of solar panels per home
- 40% green space: promoting community events and healthy lifestyles
- 30% affordable homes
- Homes are future proofed against climate change: cool in summer and warm in winter
- Meadow turf roofs: encourages biodiversity
- 'Extra care' apartments for ther elderly
Counter-urbanisation - Pull and Push factors
Pull Factors
Rural areas - less air, noise, visual pollution and more open space
Personal mobility - car ownership has increased in the last 30 years
Decline in price of agricultural produce - farmers need to make money: sell land to developers
New technology - oppertunites to work from home: 'teleworking' and shop online: 'e-tailing'
Increase in disposable income until 2008 - families had a greater choice of lifestyle
Push factors
Crime rates - belief that violence and drugs are high in urban areas
Educational attainment - lower in some urban areas
Traffic congetion in urban areas
counter-urbanisation - Effects
Positive effects :
Local Pubs - adapt to new demands but some stay traditional providing places suitable for all
Average Income & age - Increased in rural areas since 1990: makes the area more wealthy
Local Services - such as primary schools may see an increase in numbers
Negative Effects:
Demand for rural homes - increase in house prices so locals may not be able to afford them
Conservative outlook - established local residents may have different views than newcomers
Rural and urban areas look more alike
Population in some villages has more than doubled in the last 30 years
Road accidents - more likely on single carriageway rural road
Counter-urbanisation - St Ives (Impacts)
Where - St Ives, Cambridgeshire, 70 miles north of London
Population in 1961 - 3,800 Population in 2010 - 16,400
Advantage of living there - good road access: A4, rail links into Cambridgeshire & London, people commute to Cambridge, 1/4 working population commute to London each day
Impacts
Traffic congestion - particularly during rush hours on the A4
Rising house prices - detached houses rose to £291,000 in 2010
Flood risks - new developments long the River Great Ouse & floodplain - 1000 properties at risk
More services - increase in food, grocery, clothes shops, cafes and restaurants
Population structure - more people under 16: preassure on schools more primary schools needed
Counter-urbanisation - St Ives (Management)
New houses - approved in 2010 to build 200 new homes: 75 affordable
New schools - expanded primary schools: 240 new places
Flood protection - (due to the 1998 and 2003 flood) flood protection costing £8.8 million was completed along the river in 2007: new revetments and flood walls in St Ives
Transport - £116 million guided busway linking St Ives to Huntington & Cambridge have been buiilt: reduce congestion
Urban Decline - Causes
Main cause – Deindustrialisation (decline of manufacturing industry
Secondary cause – population declines: increased by suburbanisation & counter-urbanisation
Who leaves/stays? – social segregation
Secondary cause: - Less invesment - Decline in environment
- Less council tax (dereliction, graffiti)
Downward spiral in which urban decline accelerates
Urban Decline - London (cause)
London - 1980
Decline in population - lost 16% between 1939-81 deu to suburbanisation & couner-urbanisation
East End (docks) lost 20% in 10 years before 1981
Decline in employement - Closure of docks in 1980: 10,000 lost jobs directly, 100,000 lost jobs indirectly, in some parts of teh East End unemployement rose to 60%
1960-81: 1.6 million jobs lost all over UK - 75% in urban areas (manufacturing sector)
Deindustrialisation - was the main cause and can be seen as an inevitable stage in a country's economic development
Urban Decline - London (Impact)
Economic
Inner city unemployement rate - 50% higher than rest of the country
Traditional manufacturing areas - (Liverpool, Sheffiled) worst hit: had greatest industrial decline
Reason link to globalisation
Social
1951-81 - UK's largest conurbations lost 35% os population: push factor = economic decline
Talented, qualified individuals left - 'Brain Drain': remaining population was older & less qualified
Environment
Physical environment of inner city - poor quality housing, dereliction, lack of open space
Those who remained were least able & least motivated to make imporvements = continued decline: 'negative multiplier effect'
Urban Regeneration - UK's History
1945 - 1967: Comprehensive Redevelopment
After WWII - housing crisis so government introduced policy of decentralistion: people encouraged to move to New Towns
Large Scale clearence of Terraced Housing (Elswick, Newcastle)
New Council House Estates built (Byker Wall, Newcastle)
Most authorities use high rise flats - change look & structure of inner city
1968 - 1977: Urban Aid
Grants to local authorities to expand services and establish self-help in the comunity
Emphasis on attracting employment oppertunities
BUT: schemes failed due to economic recession which meant lack of funds
Urban Regeneration - UK's History continued
1978 - 1990: Action for Cities
New Towns: abandoned
75% grants to most needy authorities + Derelict land grants for reclemation schemes
Enterprise zones - stimulate economic activities & industrial growth with tax breaks: initiate regeneration
Urban development corporations - catalyst for development of inner city areas (London Docks)
1990+: City Challenge
Local authorities, where there are severe urban problems can bid for funds for projects
Policy has been unified into a single policy: was too fragmented
In Leicester inner city has been transformed
New neighbourhood renewal fund of £800 million is to be introduced over 3 years
Urban Regeneration - UK's History continued
Now: Sustainable Communities Act (2007)
Principle that - local people kno best about what needs to be done to improve their area
Channel for local people to ask government to take action
Local people decide what they think should be done to promote sustainability in their area
Regeneration Schemes
Property led -
Government agencies set up to spend public money to buy land, improve infastructure & on marketing to attract private invesments
Private companies make decisions and are given benefits
Aim - Boost private invesments hoped this would be 4x greater than public money initially invested
Partnership -
Schemes where local authorities & local residents work with private comapny(s) to make improvemnets to urban areas - different groups are consulted
Aim - Allow co-operation between different groups who have an interest in improving the area
Flagship schemes - often partnership schemes that are arge, multi-million punds projects
Gentrification - regeneration by individuals based on improvments to property
Urban Regeneration - London Docklands
This is a property led scheme
1981 - London's Dockland Corporation (LDDC) set up to imporve economic, social, environmenal problems after the decline of the world's busiest ports
Unemployment soared, housing fell into despair, lack of transport & leisure facilities
The area became the first Enterprise Zones in 1981
Land was made rate free for 10 years
Employment - low rents attracted hi-tech & financial firms (ITV Studios, The Telegraph)
Housing - Warehouses = luxury expensive luxury flats, small amount of low cost housing
Leisure - large shopping area made near Canary Wharf, parks crated, Millenium Dome built
Transport - Docklands Light Railway (DLR connects with Bank and Monument underground stations: travel into the City = easy, City Airport = easy for businessmen to use
Regeneration - London Docklands (Economic effects)
Employment - in media organisations & financial sector: restored 600,00 jobs that were lost
Image - Alpha++ world city = booost image = more foreign invesments
New houses - luxury apartment: working in finace/media, redeveloped council properties = locals on lower income
Tranport - DLR, new road links, City Airport
Tourism - creates employment oppertunities boosting local economy (o2 arena)
CBD - London now has 3: West End, the old City of Lonndon, Cnary Wharf
Regeneration - London Docklands (Social effects)
Jobs & housing - not benefited local people: Canning Town (2.5km from Canary Wharf) has 25% less average income than Canary Wharf
No invesment in the environment
Local communities destroyed as poeple priced out
Local businesses closed - competition from hypermarkets
Boroughs which were supposed to be regenerated are the poorest (Tower Hamlet)
2012 Olympic - impoved existing traansport: DLR, road links, City Airport
Housing - warehouses converted to luxury apartments gentrified the area
Regeneration - London Olympics (Aims)
The London 2012 Olympics was a partnership regenration scheme
Imspire people to be more active: make UK a leading sports nation
Athletes Village: become housing for locals -1/2 affordable out of 4,000 & should have schools
Olympic park: become community facilites that can be used by loacls
Reclaim derelict/brownfield sites - encourage invesments, settlements
Improve transport
Employment oppertunities
Use of 5 sports staduims after the Games
Permenant tourist 'attraction'
Regeneration - Olympics (Economic effects)
- 380 comapnies, employing 11,000 had to relocate
+ They were paid compensation by Olympic Delivery Authority & many stayed in East London
+ In 2010 Google & FB signed up to be part of a new vision for the media centre
+ UK gov. hoped it would create 3,000 high tech jobs
+ Reclaiming derelict land encouraged business & investments
+ The Olympics brought more than £9 billion of investments
+ Hope to create 12,000 permenant jobs
+ Media Centre now primarily houses Infinity (data business): anticipated 3,500 jobs
+ Westfield shopping centre created 10,000 permenant jobs
- Lack of employment for those without qualifications: In Canning Twon, 2001 census showed that over 43% of the adult populationn had no qualifications
Regeneration - Olympics (Social effects)
+ Image of the area has improved
+ 35% of the 2,800 flats in the Athletes Village will be affordable
- A lot less than the original plan of 4,000 homes with 75% affordable
+ Improved transport links - 2 underground links, Javelin train
+ Westfield Shopping Centre provided 2,800 jobs to locals who were previously unemplyed
+ New nursery, primary, secondary schools and sixth form in Athletes Village
+ Leisure facilities: Aquatics Centre, Copper Box, park land
- House prices increased in the area: high salary city workers interested in buying properties so prices increase = local on lower incomes cannot afford to buy them
- Very few jobs created for locals: MP of Bethnal Green and Bow Rushanara Ali felt it was a 'missed oppertunity'
Regeneration - Olympics (Environmental effects)
+ Re-landscaping the area into a huge leisure facility for locals
+ Main legacy: transformation of an area in which environmental quality was poor
+ Cleaned up derelict warehouses & contaminated land which had created toxic waste problems in the past
+ Electricity pylons had blighted environmental quality: were the first to be demolished, power lines taken underground
+ Soil cleaned in a 'soil hospital' and then used for landscaping
+ Major clean up of the River Lea and its canals: created a new waterside park
Regeneration - Gentrification
Signs of gentrification
Impoved quality of housing: particularly 'period properties'
Change in the type of services: more bars, restaurants, antique shops, and specialist food shops aimed at affluent professionals
Expensive cars parked in the street
Regeneration - Gentrification (Effects)
Positive effects
- Local environment is improved - area looks 'smarter'; houses are renovated, no graffiti, improved street furniture
- Property prices increase in the area as affluent people are interested in the area - property sellers/landlords make more profit
- Performance of local primary schools improve - parents have a positive outlook on education so offer help and resources to their chidren, more council tax so more can be spent on schools
Negative effects
Tensions/conflicts may occur between original residents & new comers - different outlook on life, process disrupts residents (noise)
Property prices increase - hard for younger gen. & those on lower income to buy/rent in the area
Community may be disintegrated - People leave the area and the image of the area changes
Regeneration - Gentrification: Notting Hill
Where - Notting Hill, West London in the Royal Borough of Chelsea and Kensington
History - Industrialisation brought workers so landlords built tiny terraced houses. During Victorian era it was a rough working class area.
1958 - race riots after tensions arose between Afro-Carribean Community and Teddy Boys
1976 - Second riot during the infamous Notting Hill Carnival
Change in last 30 years - swarm of gentrification, estate agents began coining names like 'Hillgate Village', property prices rocketed: can cost more than that in Mayfair, secluded communal gardens make it London's most desirable area
Regeneration - Gentrification: Notting Hill
Positive effects:
- Movie stars, singers, media types & fashion designers like Stella McCartney flood the area: atmosphere is like the sort that was associated with King's Road in the 1960's
- Vibrant main streets & peaceful residential area with variety of properties: moden new-build apartments, flats in converted Victorian buildings, grand large houses
- Canal Way branch of Sainsbury's: best place in London to spot celebrities
- Veronica's devotes itself to reviving Britain's culinary heritage, serving historical dishes derived from 2,000 year old menus
Negative effects:
- Extremely expensive & overpriced
- Standard of living is poor
- Streets filled with litter & buildings covered with graffitti
Waste Management
EU targets for UK - 35% of household waste to be recycled or composted by 2015
67% of municipal waste to be recovered by 2015
Biodegradable municipal waste down to 35% of 1995 figures by 2020
EU has now set a limit on the amount of biodegradable waste that can go to landfill
UK gov. has imposed a £32 per tonne tax on councils on any material going to landfills
East Midlands - 31.8% of all waste was recycled in 2005/06
Waste Management - Leicester
Where - Leicester is in Leicestershire, East Midlands, England
Decision makers - Biffa Waste Services, Leicester City Council
Orange bag scheme - all recyclables are sorted by residents into an orange bag, which is collected weekly and dispatched to mills for recovery in Yorkshire
Black bin scheme - Non-recyclables are put in here and is collected weekly and taken to the Biffa site in Beaumont Leys and put through a ball mill
92% of the waste is recycled by Biffa
There are no landfills in Leicester: rubbish has to be taken to Swadlincote or Husbands Bosworth
Ball mill process - Rubbish is fed into a cylinder. Metal is separated by a magnet & sent for recylcing. Plastic, paper, fabric (floc) is separated & sent to a cement kiln (is burnt - recovery). Smallest materials pass through flip flop screen & is separated. All that's left is organic waste which is sent to Wanlip for anaerobic digestion. This produces biogas (methane) providing electricity for 1,500 homes. The sludge left over is mixed with compost & used in forestry.
Waste Management - Dharavi, Mumbai
Decision makers: 'Ragpickers'
Waste is collected by 'Ragpickers' - there are 300,000 of them
It's informal - low pay, no health & safety, self-employed
What is recycled - glass, metal, plastic
It is sold to scrapdealers who process it and sell it on the market
Seller & buyer both make money - wages in Dharavi are above the monthly average at 3,000-15,000rupees per month
80% of Mumbai's waste is recycled in Dharavi's 13th Compound
Methane produced from the waste is used o produce biogas (fuel)
E-Waste - (recycled illegally) break down PCs by boiling, crushing & burning parts to extract gold/platinum: this releases toxic waste (lead, mercury, cadmium) cauisng serious health problems
Waste Management - Curitiba, South Brazil
Decision Maker - Jamie Lerner (mayor)
Recycle - 2/3 of all household waste.
Colour coded recycling teams collect rubbish weekly which is sorted by the householders.
Rubbish is sold to recycling companies. They separate the galss, plastic, metal, process it & sell them
'Green Exchange' - people in poor areas can exchange bags of rubbish for bus passes, eggs, fruit & veg, children can get chocolate
Reuse - thrown away books are sent to local libraries
Transport Management - Curitiba
Why traffic problem - more people = more congestion due to urbanisation, roads not wide enough & of poor quality, increase in commuters
Decision makers - Jamie Lerner & Hitoshi
Bus & glass boarding tubes - buy ticket in tube, comes every 60s, same level: easy for wheelchairs, triple articulated,carry 270 people,own lanes, colour coded & built locally: Volvo, hybrid
Artieries - 5 of them, diverts traffic from centre which is pedestrianised with trees, encourage developments along the arteries
Network of parks - flood defense, ecnourages biodiversity, walk/cycle on pathways, rings the city
Quasi-public business - part of profit goes to gov, part to private bus companies
Used by 85% of the population
2008-14 - lost 14 million users
Transport Management - London
Why traffic problem - cars used for long & short jouneys = congestion, increase in commuters
Decision maker - mayor of London
Oyster cards - (used to board trains) speeds up movement through barriers: 2.2 million use it daily
Trams - Croydon tramlink reintroduced & extended
Cycling - investmenst in cycling networks, encouraging use of Borris Bikes: £2 to rent for a day
Underground - some lines being extended & stations renovated
Buses - more doors = easy loading, night buses, have own lane
Rail fares - raised at peak times: 2/3 can't alter travel times so encourages car usage
Congestion charges - cars producing a lot of CO2 taxed £25 a day (from Feb 2008) but hybrid & electric cars can get 100% discounts
Transport Management - Seattle
Why traffic problem - failing street network, congestion
Decision makers - Mayor: Nickels, Seattle Department of Transportation
Taxing businesses - $25 per full time emplyer/year for those who coomute to work in a single occupancy vehicle
Pedestrian Master Plan - encourages walking
Bycicle Master Plan - encourages cycling
Repair 144 block of sidewalk & build 177 block of new sidewalk
'Safe routes to school' - near 30 elementary schools
Add an extra 4 miles of multi-use paths
Secure 45,000 hours of new Metro Transit service
Retailing
Retailing - business of selling goods to consumers
Decentralisation of retailing - major retailers have moved from the CBD to the edge of the city
Retail trends pre 1988 - people would go to different stored to buy different things (baker, grocer, butcher), it was a daily thing
Retail trends post 1990 - invention of refrigirator means that people can buy in bulk and store it. Shopping is seen as a 'family social event' as people shop once a weekly or fortnightly.
E-tail - shopping online: this is becoming more common
Decentralisation of Retailing - Causes
Increased mobility - number of people owning cars has increased so more congestion in city centres and lack of parking spaces, people can also travel further to shop
Congestion - there is less congestion out of town than in teh CBD
Car park - expensive in CBD but is free out of town
Shopping habits & expectations - 'family social activity' so spend all day out: need entertainment -> not always found in CBD, busy people tend to e-tail, working parents -> buy in bulk as they don't have time
Recession = lack of investments fro CBD - rents in CBD are expensive so companies may not make desired profit so they invest in out of town shopping centres instead where they are bound to make a profit
Decentralisation of Retailing - Consequences
Congestion on the edge of cities - more people shop/work there = increased traffic & usually close to motorway
Cloning (uniformity of out of town shopping) - all out of towns & high streets look the same with the same chain stores: people chose to shop closer as the shops are the same
Suburbs become wealthier - more businesses so people in the suburbs can get jobs there & investments help make the area wealthy
Divide affluent middle class & poorer city dwellers - affluent people can afford to travel & shop at out of town which the city dweellers may not be able as they are percieved to be expensive
Multiplier effect:
People suburbanise/counter-urbanise = shops follow*: chasing the money = their success brings more shops = out of town shopping centre built = hypermarkets see success & follow = Leisure parks see success & follow = businesess see profit in the area & follow
* Process of shops moving is initiated by decline in CBD = less shoppers = less profit
Out of Town Shopping Centre - Fosse Park
Where - Leicester
Opened - 1989: original shops like Next and BHS still exist, extension 'Fosse Park South' - large electrical/furnishing stores (PC World)
Advantages:
- 40 stores including Foreign Money Bureau
- Motorway & road links - Junction 21 of M1, close to M69, outer ringroad, bus links from CBD
- Facilities for disabled - rent mobility scooters, easy access for wheelchairs
- Safe for families - walkways away from traffic
- Meridian Leisure Park is close by
- 8 million visitors a year
Out of Town Shopping Centre - Fosse Park
Disadvantages:
- Walkways not waterproof
- Too expensive: lack of independent stores
- Heavy traffic during peak times & bank holidays
- Restaurants - lack of choice
- Public transport - restricted as only from CBD & takes 25 mins
- Difficult for low income/older people to access - lack of public transport
- 'Soulless' - Sir Peter Soulsby, Leicester City Mayor
Out of Town Shopping Centre - Trafford Centre
2005 - 29.4 million visitors
More than just a shopping centre - 1,600 seat food court, 18 lane pin bowling alley, laser quest arena, 20-screen cinema
Barton Square expanion - concentrating on kitchen and furniture, finished in 2006
Motorway links - close to Junctions 9 & 10 of M60, easy links to M6, M61, M62, M602 to Manchester City Centre
Free parking - space for 11,000
Bu station - can deal with 120 buses per hour
Bid rent curve
Redevelopment of a CBD - Leicester
What was done:
'Connecting Leicester' - create a connected, family friendly CBD that is pdestrian friendly and where locals can enjoy the historic city through various schemes
Decision makers - Sir Peter Souldby (city mayor), Leicester City Council
Why initiated - CBD was in decline, response to Fosse Park, increase investmnets, make heritage sites accessable, connect different parts of the CBD
Redevelopment of a CBD - Leicester (Impacts)
Jubilee Sqaure built on former car park - open event space at entrance of city centre via High Street, aesthetically pleasing, difficult to walk through for the 2,000 visually impaired. Cost: £4 million
Highcross - shopping centre built where Shires stood, 120 shops, bus interchange, 2,000 space car park, largest shopping outlet in East Midlands, has a showcase cinema deluxe & John Lewis. Cost: £350 million
Quarters - Culture: creativity is promoted with Curve Theatre, Athena, Makers Yard (workspace for creative entrepreneurs) built in oldest surviving hosiery factory. Cost of Makers Yard: £1.05 million, retail, The Lanes: encourages entrepreneurs, prevents clone shopping
Richard III Visitors Centre - increased tourism (there never were tourists in Leicester) 30,000 visitors since it opened in July 2014
Historic Buildings - Wygston's House (oldest surving building in the city): not open daily, Silver Arcade (Victorian shopping centre): empty shops,Cathedral: new benches and garden
Transport Improvements - New 'First' buses, new bus station near Haymarket
Related discussions on The Student Room
- The Forum Games Hurt/Heal Game »
- Edinburgh vs KCL for English »
- 5 ways students will benefit from Bradford 2025 »
- Moving to Liverpool? Here are some recommendations! »
- Bsc accounting and finance »
- Computer Science Replit, python code »
- City Vs QMUL »
- For Physics, Warwick, Bristol or Kings? »
- Why I chose DMU: Leicester, A Student City. »
- Sheffield or Loughborough London for MSc? »
Comments
Report
Report
Report