Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
- Created by: Charlotte
- Created on: 15-05-08 16:00
Key Features
* The greatest good for the greatest number - first termed by Francis Hutchinson
> Teleological - determined by consequences
> Single principle ethic
> Hedonic- pleasure seeking
> Democratic - majority determines what is right
> Secular ethic - not based on God
> Egalitarian - everyone equal. Bentham argued 'Each to count for one and no more than one'
Jeremy Bentham
> Argued for the principle of utility - actions judged as good or bad depending on results
> We should choose to bring about the greatest happiness for the greatest number
> Universal ethical hedonism - if an action increases pleasure, it is right
> Hedonic Calculus; intensity, duration, purity, extent, fecundity, propinquity, certainty
- 'Utility' refers to the tendency of producing happiness, not usefulness
Bentham's Hedonic Calculus
Strengths:
- Conclusive
- Guidelines, offers structure
- Flawless evaluation of pleasure
- Simple to understand
Weaknesses:
- Subjective
- Unrealistic, impractical e.g. time limits may occur which it doesn't allow for
- Couldjustify immoral acts
- Uncompassionate, doesn't consider human feelings
- Cannot take consequences into account
> Bentham founder of British Utilitarianism
> Social context; French+ IndustrialRevolutions, social upheaval, Dickensian England
> Pleasure is subjective - it is presumed that it is quantative rather than qualitative-unrealistic/impractical/uncompassionate
John Stuart Mill
> Developed a theory referring to qualitative not quantitative pleasures
> Argued that pleasures of the mind take precedence over physical ones
> Humanity's primary concern should be for the 'higher order of things'
> Said 'It is better to be a dissatisfied Socrates than a fool satisfied'
Nina Rosenstand
Utilitarianism in the Work Place
> Contemporary philosopher
> In hospitals - QUALY (quality, life, adjusted years), used to determine who is most worthy of saving
> Job front - marks awarded for different desirable attributes
Strengths
# Evaluation of moral choices influenced only by personal preferences - no consideration of consequences
# Consensus that human wellbeing is intrinsically good, actions should be judged according to this
# Jesus preached ethic of love - 'Do unto others...' (Matthew 7:12)
# Motives may be good or bad but only the consequences have an effect
# Provides a democratic approach to decision making - majority's interests priority
# Current circumstances can be judged without reference to similar situations - every case is different
Weaknesses
# We may be unaware of all the consequences of our actions for ourselves/others
# Pleasure is subjective, therefore some may find it pleasurable to inflict pain on others
# People may have different ideas about what is right and the best outcome
# Theory gives no credit to motivation - some people may attempt good things which fail, they should be acknowledged for this
# According to Bentham's theory, if the majority wanted to commit acts of torture it would be permissable - the majority may not always be right
# Theory relies on single principle - we cannot solve every dilemma with this
# Values such as love/justice have no place - majority may support unjust
# No allowances for personal feelings; we have a duty to those we love and must sometimes act on instinct rather than the most utilitarian way
Forms of Utilitarianism
Act: Deals with the consequences of individual acts, acceptsno general rules, situational, promotes happiness
Rule: Allows respect for existing rules, collectiverules for society
Preference: Should act in a way reflecting the preference of those concerned
Scholarly Opinion
J C C Smart: Pro Utilitarianism
> It has its weaknesses but no moral system is perfect
> Sometimes acting for the greatest number can cause short term suffering- a reasonable exchange
> Utilitarianism offers an objective basis for making moral decisions
Bernard Williams: Anti Utilitarianism
> It can lead to unjust actions - if slavery brings more happiness than pain, does it become reasonable?
> Overstates the importance of things that are measurable. How do we measure love/truth?
> How far in the future do the effects of one's actions need to be calculated?
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Religious studies eduqas A-level A02 30 marker structure help »
- OCR A Level Religious Studies Religion and ethics H573/02 - 14 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat] »
- can anyone help me with utilitarianism »
- OCR A-Level Religious Studies Paper 2 (H573/02) 19th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- Kantian Ethics Essay »
- AQA A Level Philosophy Paper 1 + 2 (7172/1+2) 18th and 26th May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- 2022 exam paper philosophy of religion,ethics and Buddhism. »
- Edexcel A-level Religious Studies Paper 1 (9RS0 01) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- AQA A Level Philosophy Paper 1 7172/1 - 19 May 2022 [Exam Chat] »
- Not sure if I should do Philosophyðics A-Level »
Comments
No comments have yet been made