Stuart Britain
- Created by: Serenajoyl
- Created on: 08-03-16 17:46
Charles I Personal Rule - Scotland
Bishops War
- Scots opposing Charles' imposition of Laudiansim
- Allowed Scots to call religious Assembly 1638
- Proceed to annual canon laws & abolish episcopacy
Covenanters - did not trust Charles = kept army reduced amount of royal power in Scotland
- C1's position changed
- 1637 - armed themselves when asked to read LPB
Treaty of Ripon
- Agreed to Pay living costs of Scottish Army / Charles called for another Parliament
Charles - would not back down in response to October revolt / Moderates = radicals
Scottish petition movement - SNC = radical Presbyterians = manifesto to unite people against Charles
Charles I Personal Rule - Fiscal Feudalism
Fiscal Feudalism
- Monopolies allowed grants to corporations £33,000
- Forest Fines
- Land fines
- Recusancy fines =income increased from £5300 - £26866
- Customs duties = tonnage & poundage granted for 1 year - C1 continued to collect it
- Distraint of Knighthood = land owning income £40 per year
- Those who had not seen / received a KH a coronation = fined
Charles I Personal Rule - Ireland
Ireland
- 1629 - politically divided
- Policy of plantation - land taken by English crown & given to English settlers
- Laudiansim is seen as too close to Catholicism
- Threatened Protestants
- 1637 Scottish Rebellion - prompted Irish Catholics to act
Thomas Wentworth 1632
- Increasing customs duty to allow English Crown to gain profit
- Advised Charles to call a short Parliament
- Suceeded in enhancing authority of English Crown & Church over Irish
Charles Personal Rule - Opposition in England
Announcement of illegality of ship money = won over the Commons
Long term solution could only be achieved if Charles made concessions with Parliament
Charles' decision to face Scots without Parliament = tensions & development of CW
- Unity about ending abuses of PR
- Judgement for crown by narrow majority = politically costly for Charles
Hampden Case 1637
- Refusal to pay ship money
- Closely connected with those who oppose Charles' regime
- Prosecution would make a point that authority should be obeyed
Financial Weaknesses of the Crown
Charles' Anti-Spanish Policy
- Financial support for Protestant Dutch
- Naval Attack on Spain aimed at capturing their shipments of gold from SA
- Had to resort to other prerogative methods
- Financial support for Christian IV of Denmark to attack Catholics through northern Germany
- Granted customs tax for 1 year only
Raising Prerogative Income worried PN
- Greater possiblity of monarch becoming indepedent & politically absolutist
- Court spending at a double than before
- Difficult for crown to govern efficiently = conduct an aggressive FP
- Dependent on PN for substantial funds
- James' extravagance - political problem
- 3 subsidies £44,000 - 3 Scottish friends
Financial Weaknesses of the Crown
- TYW = called on Parliament for subsidies & war broke out between Charles & Parliament
- Financial weaknesses threatened to become a political problem - FEB 1611 - James dissolved Parliament
- MPs were reluctant to give reform that was needed
- Positive Patronage = crucial to political system
Failure to reform finances in E's reign led to inflation & crowns finances growing
- Bad Harvests 1623 & 1624 = weakened crowns finances
- Not enough money raised & damaged rep of crown (Cockayne Project failed to help crowns finances)
- 1603 - crown still in debt
- 1604 - Treaty of London - peace with Spain reduced Crown's expediture
- 1610 Contract collapsed & Crown & Parliament distrusted eachother
Monarchs & Parliaments
Issues In 1621
Religion
- MPs - unsettled with becoming at peace with Spain
- Dawry
- TYW - Protestants & Catholics = series of wars = religious divide
Finance
- England = not trading well with partners
- Monopolies = exploited by many courtiers = to attack eachother
- Politics = indication about factional fighting
- Statute of monopolies = limited the crowns right to grant monopolies
Monarchs & Parliaments
Issues in 1621
Favourites
- Buckngham, Cranfield, Coke
Foreign Policy
- Failure of Madrid Trip 1624 - MPs were reluctant to give funds
- Monarchs prerogative - Parliament have no right to discuss it
- J1 = implied MPs talked about FP to frighten Spanish
- Spanish Match - anti Spanish sentiment from Parliament
- Prince Charles & Buckingham involvement = converted to anti-spanish policy & led to start of Anglo-Spanish War
Monarchs & Parliaments
Main Parliamentary Grievances
Taxation
- FP failure Cadiz
- MPs = concerned with illegality of extra parliamentary taxation
- Charles asking for more & more money
FKC
- 76 people imprisoned for refusal to pay forced loan
- Judgement not general right
- JE - TOL = considered to create a Bill of Rights
- Upheld Charles' prerogative
- General had to falsify the records to state King had general right
Monarchs & Parliaments
Main Parliamentary Grievances
Martial Law
- To stop soldiers from being billeted in the South West
- Overruled all other laws
- Too much absolutism for gentry
Billeting
- Civillians = house & feed soldiers meant to get paid
- Troops raised for war in Europe - billeted with local popualtion
- 'Free quarter'
Attempts to Strengthen Crown's Finances
Great Contract 1610
- Cecil negotiating with parliament - reform of parliaments
- Crown debt = £280,000 & annual expenditure £511,000
Book of Rates
- Official valuations of those items on which customs duties should be paid
Sought annual subsidy - £200,000 in exchange for feudal rights
- James would give up prerogative income from wardship
- Parliament prorogued for the summer
Feudal System of Rule
- From 1066 , Monarchs had the right to grant land to members of the PN
Attempts to Strengthen Crown's Finances
Robert Cecil sought to increase income & cut James' spending
James agreement 1608 - 1609 = did not keep
Crown had right to levy impositions = source of revenue & means of regulating trade
Impositions - 1606 court judgement declaring crown had absolute prerogative to issue important issues
Monarchs & Parliaments
Character of James I
- Believed in his importance
- Views on monarchy brought him into conflict with Parliament
- Firm belief of divine right of kings
- Interest in new concepts about mental & physical diseases
- Affected by early years as a boy Scotland
- Rough hawn manner & natural paranoia
- Guarded manner - parents were killed
- Believed kings took authority from God
Monarchs & Parliaments
Character of Charles I
- Good linguistic & a sensitive man of refined tastes
- Power - confined to king & not shared out between others
- Tensions between king & parliament
- Spent alot on the arts = Van Dyk & Rubens
- Reserved self righteous = concept for royal authority (DROK)
- DROK - order could be achieved by the king acting out a role
- Reform of royal court = create an ideal society for subjects to emulate (conform to clear ideals)
Monarchs & Parliaments
Courts
- James = politically skillful & court = open & lively
- Early dominance of bed chamber by the scots
- Model for what could be achieved
- Charles - politically shy & court = microcosm of miniature version of his state
Personalities
- Both believers in the divine right to rule
- James = intellectual, enjoyed debate & dealing with the people = pragmatic
- James = outgoing, effectionate & talkative
- Charles = painfully shy, aloof, quiet & cold
Interests
- James = more intellectual whereas Charles enjoyed the arts
- Duke of Buckingham
Monarchs & Parliaments
Powers of the Monarch
- Almost absolutist
- Top of the hierarchy
- Power over foreign diplomacy
- Legislation = right to call & dissolve parliament
- Commander-in-chief of military
- Head of PN
LImitations of Monarch
- Limits on monarchs income
- Relied on justices of peace
- Funds had to go through parliament
- Need of PN
- Parliament had to grant subsidies for the monarch - control of financial resources
James I's Parliament
Hampton Court Conference
- 1604
- Response to the millenary petition
- No bishop no king = James mistakenly thought puritan Reynolds advocated abolition of episcopacy
- Many believed James was hostile to Puritans
- Religious conference
- KJB
Shirley's Case
- 1604
- Shirley arrested for debt
- Arrest upset MP's
- Royal prerogative vs Parliamentary power
- Keen to establish parliamentary power of freedom
Monarchs & Parliaments
Bancfrofts Canons
- September 1604
- Gov - full support of church laws
- Church laws upheld many orthodox doctrines & litergies
- Condemned by Puritans in P
Parliamentary Privilege
- Legal immunity enjoyed by members of parliament that allows them to freely speak during proceedings
- Parliament can function effectively
- James can exploit powers by controlling parliament
- No fear of legal action - raising controversial questions & debates
Monarchs & Parliaments
Buckinghamshire Election
- 1604
- Goodwin
- James = commons were acting illegally in allowing an outlaw to sit as an MP
- Matter of constitutional dispute over balance between parliamentary privilege & prerogative
Favourites
- MPs focused on abuse of monopolies as a means to attack Buckingham
- Encouraged parliament to impeach Bacon
- Exploited by many courtiers Coke, Bacon & Cranfield
- Monopolies = indication of factional fighting
Addled Parliament - 1614
- Lasted no more than 8 weeks as called on parliament for funds
- Factional conflict & emergence of competing groups
- Financial need after death of Cecil
Outbreak of Civil War
Five Members Coup - Jan 1642
- Announced impeachement of Pym, Hampden
- Demonstration against Charles
- Led to physical division of Crown & parliament = conflict
- Coup strengthened parliamentary radicals
- Lords accepted commons vote of impeachement - loss of significant royalist support
Exclusion Bill
- Popular support encouraged by petitioning & campaigning
- Pressure of London Crowd lessened the influence of King on Parliament
- February 1642
Outbreak of Civil War
Militia Ordinance - Feb 1642
- Parliament able to assume control of the armed forces
- Able to do appointing without royal assent
- Appointed lord lieutenants & their deputies by authority of parliament
Commissions of Array
- Response to MO & led to conflict from radicals on both sides
- Charles used prerogative powers to raise armed forces
- Sent to counties = meant they were authorised to raise forces for the crown
Nineteen Prepositions - June 1642
- Stated Parliaments demands for a negotiated settlement
- 5 MP's to be pardoned e.g. FMC
- Answer to this was written on behalf of the king
- C1 had to accept TA & MO
First Civil War
Pym Reforms
- Parliament - combined executive with representative authority & developed methods for running country without king - creating new structures
- Persuaded members to accept a formal alliance with the solemn league & covenanters
- 21,000 men sent to England to help parliament
Control of Navy
- Parliament are able to supply forces
- Prevents Charles from receiving supplies
New Model Army
- Regularly trained, paid & experienced soldiers = never to be defeated
- Civil war became war of attrition ( armies gradually wear down eachothers strengths)
- Motivated by Puritan religion
First Civil War
Parliamentary Control of London
- Administration - took advantage of an already established centre of admin
- Propaganda & finances -parliament have access to resources & have more support
- Port = London industry & chief industrial centre
First Civil War
Reasons for defeat due to Charles
Charles' leadership
- indicisive in following through on initial promises at start of the war
Court divisions
- Differing viwes e.g. Hyde as he advised continuing attempts to settle with parliament
- HM= counselled a continued war until total victory was achieved
Charles - poor military leader by appointing himself commander-in-chief
- He did not listen to or act on best advice
First Civil War
Reasons for defeat due to Charles
COW Oxford
- Oxford suffered from limited authority with royalist commanders
- COWB - set up by Charles which removed capable men from the COWO
- Charles - wasn't able to communicate with relevant people & did not listen to COW
Reliance on Foreign Aid
- Use of Rupert & Maurice left him open to attack
- Negotiating with France & Pope = propaganda for parliament which was published in the Kings cabinet opened
Earl of Newcastle
- Did not march his northern royalist army to support London attack 1643
Revolution 1629-49
Nineteen Prepositions challenged authority
- Parliament raises army so charles cannot use army against them
- Parliament - raise children so their is no catholic heir
- Church reform = no Laudianism = no absolutism & personal rule
- Offspring cannot get married unless they have parliamentary permission
- Laws enforced against catholics = eradication of Protestants
Growth of Opposition
- London Crowd = used by radical MPs e.g. Pym to put pressure on the Lords to exclude Bishops
- Such a threat that C1 feared his and his family safety
- London Crowd came out to defend the TOL in 1641
- Becoming more & more involved in politics
Revolution 1629-49
Pym
Methods
- Using parliamentary committees to steer parliament towards settlement
- Impeachment of Wentworth & Laud
- Supporting Bedfords bridge appointments scheme
- Formation of working alliance with Scottish Covenanters
- Using parliamentary financial pressures to control Charles' political options
- Getting parliament to transfer to itself some key pp
King Pym - indication of prominence & for public & Westminster
- Pyms junto - Pym & allies had become new ruling power
- Visible & vocal face of increasingly radical attack on C1
- Symbol as how Parliament became more of a threat to moderates than C1
Revolution 1629-49
Interdependence
- Billiard ball effect
- Parliament were divided over whether Charles could be trusted or not
- Cause & effect
- Rebellion - prompted by events in Scotland & Ireland
- Radicalised situationin England
Irish Rebellion 1641-42
- Catholicism fear = protestant English
- Massacre = supposed plan Wentworth would bring English army
- Politicians may become radicalised & determined to avenge protestant massacre
Radicalisation affected development of support for monarchy from moderate MPs
Treaty of Ripon led to Irish Rebellion
Comments
No comments have yet been made